Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537898›Full record

ReviewExpert review of medical devices

Advances in the measurement of prosthetic socket interface mechanics: a review of technology, techniques, and a 20-year update.

Peyton R Young, Jacqueline S Hebert, Paul D Marasco, Jason P Carey, Jonathon S Schofield

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of medical devices. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ion-Pair-Tuned Ionogels for Broad-Range Linear Pressure Sensing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A biofidelic mock residual limb for prosthetic socket testing.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peyton R YoungDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Jacqueline S HebertFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Paul D MarascoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jason P CareyFaculty of Engineering, Deans Office, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jonathon S SchofieldDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USAlberta Health Services · CACleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Restoring Upper Limb Movement Sense to Amputees; a Move Towards Natural Control oR01NS081710 · NINDS · CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL RESEARCH/ED/FDN · PI MARASCO, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA key determinant of prosthesis use is the quality of fit of the prosthetic socket. The socket surrounds the residual limb and applies the appropriate force distribution to the soft tissues to maintain suspension, support, and stabilization as well as translate limb movement to prosthesis movement. The challenge in socket fabrication lays in achieving geometry that provides the appropriate force distribution at physiologically appropriate locations; a task dependent on the understanding of interface tissue-mechanics. AREAS COVERED: In the last 20 years substantial advancements in sensor innovation and computational power have allowed researchers to quantify the socket-residual limb interface; this paper reviews prominent measurement and sensing techniques described in literature over this time frame. Advantages and short comings of each technique are discussed with a focus on translation to clinical environments. EXPERT OPINION: Prosthetic sockets directly influence comfort, device use, user satisfaction, and tissue health. Advancements in instrumentation technology have unlocked the possibility of sophisticated measurement systems providing quantitative data that may work in tandem with a clinician's heuristic expertise during socket fabrication. If validated, many of the emerging sensing technologies could be implemented into a clinical setting to better characterize how patients interact with their device and help inform prosthesis fabrication and assessment techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsProsthesis ImplantationAmputation StumpsExtremitiesHumansMechanical PhenomenaProsthesis Designclinical translationforceinstrumentationpressureProsthesessensorssocket

Identifiers

PMID37537898
PMCPMC10581694
OpenAlexW4385563623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.