Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537578›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2023

Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study.

Aubrey Manack Adams, Susan Hutchinson, Ella Engstrom, Nicolai D Ayasse, Daniel Serrano, Linda Davis, Katherine Sommer, Janette Contreras-De Lama, Richard B Lipton

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aubrey Manack AdamsAbbVie, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA, 92612, USA. aubrey.adams@abbvie.com.
Susan HutchinsonOrange County Migraine and Headache Center, Irvine, CA, USA.
Ella EngstromOPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nicolai D AyasseOPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Daniel SerranoOPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Linda DavisKolvita Family Medical Group, Mission Viejo, CA, USA.
Katherine SommerAbbVie, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA, 92612, USA.
Janette Contreras-De LamaAbbVie, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA, 92612, USA.
Richard B LiptonAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
AbbVie (United States) · USOpen Health Systems Laboratory · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USMission Heritage Medical Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals using onabotulinumtoxinA as a preventive migraine treatment often use acute treatments for breakthrough attacks. Data on real-world effectiveness of the small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA are limited.

methodsCOURAGE, a prospective, multiple attack, observational study, evaluated the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant (50 or 100 mg) for acute treatment of migraine in people receiving onabotulinumtoxinA, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb), or both. This analysis focused only on onabotulinumtoxinA users. The Migraine Buddy app was used to identify eligible participants and track response to treated attacks. For each ubrogepant-treated attack, meaningful pain relief (MPR) and return to normal function (RNF) at 2 and 4 h post-dose over 30 days was assessed. MPR was defined as a level of relief that is meaningful to the participant, usually occurring before the pain is all gone. After 30 days, satisfaction was reported on a 7-point scale and overall acute treatment optimization was evaluated using the migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4).

resultsThis analysis included 122 participants who received ubrogepant and onabotulinumtoxinA and reported on 599 ubrogepant-treated attacks. Following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, MPR was achieved in 53.3% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 76.2% of participants 4 h post-dose. RNF was achieved in 25.4% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 45.9% of participants 4 h post-dose. MPR and RNF results were similar across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks. After 30 days, satisfaction with ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA was reported by 69.8% of participants and acute treatment optimization (defined as mTOQ-4 score ≥ 4) was achieved in 77.6%.

conclusionsIn this prospective real-world effectiveness study, ubrogepant treatment in onabotulinumtoxinA users with self-identified migraine was associated with high rates of MPR and RNF at 2 and 4 h as well as satisfaction and acute treatment optimization. Although the lack of a contemporaneous control group limits causal inference, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel, app-based design to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and satisfaction of treatments.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ACourageMigraine DisordersHumansPainPersonal SatisfactionProspective StudiesPyridinesPyrrolesTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type APyridinesPyrrolesubrogepantChronic migraineOnabotulinumtoxinAUbrogepant

Identifiers

PMID37537578
PMCPMC10399003
OpenAlexW4385551990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.