Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537547›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2023

"It's a cause I believe in": factors motivating participation and engagement in longitudinal, respiratory-focused research studies.

Andrew J Synn, Katherine E Menson, Mercedes R Carnethon, Ravi Kalhan, Elizabeth A Sugar, George R Washko, Robert A Wise, Michelle N Eakin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew J Synn *Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, KSB-23, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. asynn@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Katherine E Menson *Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Mercedes R CarnethonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ravi KalhanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth A SugarDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
George R WashkoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert A WiseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michelle N EakinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

The American Lung Association (ALA) Lung Health CohortU01HL146408 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CARNETHON, MERCEDES RENEE, KALHAN, RAVI · 2019 to 2024
$25.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL146408NIH HHS U01 HL146408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey to the success of any prospective cohort study is the effective recruitment and retention of participants, but the specific factors that influence younger adults of the Millennial generation to participate in research are not well-understood. The objective of this qualitative study was to identify factors that motivated participation and engagement in longitudinal research studies focused on respiratory health among a diverse group of young adults.

methodsWe conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 50 younger adult participants (aged 25-35 years) regarding factors influencing their participation in longitudinal research studies. Thematic analysis was used to develop, organize, and tabulate the frequency of key themes. In exploratory analyses, we examined for patterns in the distribution of key themes across racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic groups.

resultsParticipants identified several key themes that affected their willingness to participate in longitudinal studies. These included the health-related benefits generated by research (both to the individual and to society at-large), factors related to the institution and study team conducting the research, concerns regarding unethical and/or unrepresentative study design, and barriers to participation in research. Certain factors may be more impactful to underrepresented groups, including concerns regarding data privacy and confidentiality.

conclusionsIn this diverse group of younger adults, we identified specific factors that motivated participation and predicted high engagement in longitudinal research studies focused on respiratory health. Implementing and integrating these factors into study protocols may improve recruitment and retention, including among participants who are historically underrepresented in research.

Indexed as

Research DesignHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchYoung AdultQualitative methodsResearch study participationYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID37537547
PMCPMC10401812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.