Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537546›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2023

What is the best way to keep the patient warm during technical rescue? Results from two prospective randomised controlled studies with healthy volunteers.

Martin Lier, Christopher Jebens, Annette Lorey-Tews, Tim Heyne, Nils Kunze-Szikszay, Johannes Wieditz, Anselm Bräuer

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Accidental hypothermia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin LierDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. martin.lier@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Christopher JebensDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Emergency and Pain medicine, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Strasse 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany.
Annette Lorey-TewsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Buchholz Hospital, Steinbecker Strasse 44, 21244, Buchholz in der Nordheide, Germany.
Tim HeyneDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Nils Kunze-SzikszayDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes WieditzDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Anselm BräuerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-8755
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEEmissions Reduzierungs Concepte (Germany) · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccidental hypothermia is a manifest problem during the rescue of entrapped victims and results in different subsequent problems as coagulopathy and wound infection. Different warming methods are available for the preclinicial use. However, their effectiveness has hardly been evaluated.

methodsIn a first step a survey among German fire brigades was performed with questions about the most used warming methods. In a second step two crossover studies were conducted. In each study two different warming method were compared with forced air warming - which is the most frequently used and highly effective warming method in operation rooms (Study A: halogen floodlight vs. forced air warming; Study B: forced air warming vs. fleece blanket). In both studies healthy volunteers (Study A: 30 volunteers, Study B: 32 volunteers) were sitting 60 min in a cold store. In the first 21 min there was no subject warming. Afterwards the different warming methods were initiated. Every 3 min parameters like skin temperature, core body temperature and cold perception on a 10-point numeric rating scale were recorded. Linear mixed models were fitted for each parameter to check for differences in temperature trajectories and cold perception with regard to the different warming methods.

resultsOne hundred fifty-one German fire brigades responded to the survey. The most frequently used warming methods were different rescue blankets (gold/silver, wool) and work light (halogen floodlights). Both studies (A and B) showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values in mean skin temperature, mean body temperature and total body heat for the forced air warming methods compared to halogen floodlight respectively fleece blanket shortly after warming initiation. In contrast, values for the cold perception were significantly lower (less unpleasant cold perception) during the phase the forced air warming methods were used, compared to the fleece blanket or the halogen floodlight was used.

conclusionForced air warming methods used under the standardised experimental setting are an effective method to keep patients warm during technical rescue. Halogen floodlight has an insufficient effect on the patient's heat preservation. In healthy subjects, fleece blankets will stop heat loss but will not correct heat that has already been lost.

trial registrationThe studies were registered retrospectively on 14/02/2022 on the German Clinical Trials registry (DRKS) with the number DRKS00028079.

Indexed as

HypothermiaBody Temperature RegulationCross-Over StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAccidental hypothermiaBlanketForced air warmingHalogen floodlightPreclinical warmingTechnical rescueWarming methods

Identifiers

PMID37537546
PMCPMC10401780
OpenAlexW4385563724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.