Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537513›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Subject-Specific Automatic Reconstruction of White Matter Tracts.

Stephan Meesters, Maud Landers, Geert-Jan Rutten, Luc Florack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephan MeestersDepartment of Mathematics & Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maud LandersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan RuttenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands. g.rutten@etz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-491X
Luc FlorackDepartment of Mathematics & Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI-based tractography is still underexploited and unsuited for routine use in brain tumor surgery due to heterogeneity of methods and functional-anatomical definitions and above all, the lack of a turn-key system. Standardization of methods is therefore desirable, whereby an objective and reliable approach is a prerequisite before the results of any automated procedure can subsequently be validated and used in neurosurgical practice. In this work, we evaluated these preliminary but necessary steps in healthy volunteers. Specifically, we evaluated the robustness and reliability (i.e., test-retest reproducibility) of tractography results of six clinically relevant white matter tracts by using healthy volunteer data (N = 136) from the Human Connectome Project consortium. A deep learning convolutional network-based approach was used for individualized segmentation of regions of interest, combined with an evidence-based tractography protocol and appropriate post-tractography filtering. Robustness was evaluated by estimating the consistency of tractography probability maps, i.e., averaged tractograms in normalized space, through the use of a hold-out cross-validation approach. No major outliers were found, indicating a high robustness of the tractography results. Reliability was evaluated at the individual level. First by examining the overlap of tractograms that resulted from repeatedly processed identical MRI scans (N = 10, 10 iterations) to establish an upper limit of reliability of the pipeline. Second, by examining the overlap for subjects that were scanned twice at different time points (N = 40). Both analyses indicated high reliability, with the second analysis showing a reliability near the upper limit. The robust and reliable subject-specific generation of white matter tracts in healthy subjects holds promise for future validation of our pipeline in a clinical population and subsequent implementation in brain tumor surgery.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsWhite MatterBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsAutomated pipelineBrain tumorMRIReliabilityTractography

Identifiers

PMID37537513
PMCPMC10584769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.