ArticlePharmaceutical research2023
Revamping Biopharmaceutics-Pharmacokinetics with Scientific and Regulatory Implications for Oral Drug Absorption.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Finite Absorption Time Concept Guiding Model Informed Drug & Generics Development in Clinical Pharmacology.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Time Scale Calculus: a new approach to multi-dose pharmacokinetic modeling.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- FDA and EMA Oversight of Disruptive Science on Application of Finite Absorption Time (F.A.T.) Concept in Oral Drug Absorption: Time for Scientific and Regulatory Changes.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Application of the Finite Absorption Time (F.A.T.) Concept in the Assessment of Bioequivalence.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Coupling Drug Dissolution with BCS.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- IVIVC Revised.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods developed in the 1960s and used since for the construction of percent of drug absorbed as a function of time as well as in in vitro in vivo correlations are re-considered in the light of the physiologically sound Finite Absorption Time (F.A.T.) concept developed recently.
methodsThe classical equations for the percentage of drug absorption as a function of time were modified by taking into account the termination of drug absorption at F.A.T., replacing the parameters associated with the assumption of infinite drug absorption.
resultsMathematical analysis using the relevant Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Finite Time (PBFTK) models assuming one- or two-compartment drug disposition, revealed that the modified %absorbed versus time curves are of bilinear type with an ascending limb intersecting the horizontal line at F.A.T. A computer-based methodology is described for the estimation of F.A.T. from experimental data. More than one linear ascending limb is found when more than one absorption phase is operating. Experimental data were analyzed and the estimates for F.A.T were found to be similar to those derived from nonlinear regression analysis using PBFTPK models.
conclusionThese results place an end to the routinely reported exponential %absorbed versus time curves prevailing in biopharmaceutics-pharmacokinetics since their inception in the'60 s. These findings point to the use of the F.A.T. concept in drug absorption research and regulatory guidelines such as deconvolution techniques for the assessment of drug input rate, stochastic mean absorption time calculations, population analyses, in vitro in vivo correlations and bioequivalence guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37537424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.