ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023
The care of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in Ontario pediatric intensive care units.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Canadian anesthesiologists: it's high time to unmask the physician behind the drapes.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- Answering global challenges to the determination of death: consensus-building leadership from Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- Answering global challenges to the determination of death: consensus-building leadership from Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- Ancillary radionuclide perfusion studies in the determination of death by neurologic criteria: methods, interpretation, and lexicon-a user guide for the clinician.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe and review the experience of two pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Ontario, Canada, adapting and providing care to critically ill adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICAL FEATURES: At a time of extreme pressure to adult intensive care unit (ICU) capacity, two PICUs provided care to critically ill adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Substantial yet rapid planning was required to facilitate safe delivery of critical care to adult patients while maintaining PICU services, including thoughtful development of care pathways and patient selection. To prepare clinical staff, several communication strategies, knowledge translation, skill consolidation, and system-adaptation mechanisms were developed. There was iterative adaptation of operational processes, including staffing models, specialist consultation, and the pharmacy. Care provided by the interprofessional teams was reoriented as appropriate to the needs of critically ill adults in close collaboration with adult ICU teams. Forty-one adults were admitted to the two PICUs over a 12-week period. In total, 36 patients (88%) received invasive ventilation, eight patients (20%) were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and six patients (15%) received continuous renal replacement therapy. Four died in the PICU during this period. Feedback from staff included anxiety around reorienting practice to the care of critically ill adults, physical exhaustion, and psychological distress. Importantly, staff also reported a renewed sense of purpose with participation in the program.
conclusionThough challenging, the experience has provided opportunity to enhance collaboration with partner institutions and improve the care of older children and adolescents in the PICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.