Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537261›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

DNA-based assessment of root lesion nematode infections in cereal roots.

Ehsan Fatemi, Siegbert Melzer, Christian Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ehsan FatemiPlant Breeding Institute, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24098, Kiel, Germany.
Siegbert MelzerPlant Breeding Institute, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24098, Kiel, Germany.
Christian JungPlant Breeding Institute, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24098, Kiel, Germany. c.jung@plantbreeding.uni-kiel.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root lesion nematodes (RLN) of the genus Pratylenchus are causing significant damage in cereal production worldwide. Due to climate change and without efficient and environment-friendly treatments, the damages through RLNs are predicted to increase. Microscopic assessments of RLNs in the field and the greenhouses are time-consuming and laborious. As a result, cereal breeders have mostly ignored this pest. We present a method measuring RLN in infected cereal roots using a standardized PCR approach. Publicly available Pratylenchus neglectus primer combinations were evaluated. An optimal primer combination for RT-qPCR assay was identified to detect and quantify P. neglectus within infected cereal roots. Using the RT-qPCR detection assay, P. neglectus could be clearly distinguished from other plant parasitic nematodes. We could identify P. neglectus DNA in barley and wheat roots as low as 0.863 and 0.916 ng/µl of total DNA, respectively. A single P. neglectus individual was detected in water suspension and within barley and wheat roots. The RT-qPCR detection assay provides a robust and accurate alternative to microscopic nematode identification and quantification. It could be of interest for resistance breeding, where large populations must be screened to detect and quantify P. neglectus in farmer's fields.

Indexed as

HordeumNematode InfectionsTylenchoideaAnimalsDNAEdible GrainPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPlant RootsTriticumDNA

Identifiers

PMID37537261
PMCPMC10400682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.