ArticleBMJ open2023
Impact of hospitalist care model on patient outcomes in acute medical unit: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Hospitalist-Led Care on Glycemic Control Among Hospitalized Adults with Diabetes in Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Shortening emergency department length of stay: Fast track, short-stay unit and acute medical unit.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Review
- Effect of SMS Ward Round Notifications on Inpatient Experience in Acute Medical Settings: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- An effective multi-step feature selection framework for clinical outcome prediction using electronic medical records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Economic evaluation of the hospitalist care model in an acute medical unit: a benefit-cost analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess a newly introduced, hospitalist-run, acute medical unit (AMU) care model at a tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingTertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea.
participantsWe evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the emergency department (ED) from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017.
interventionsThe study compared multiple outcomes among medical inpatients from the ED between the non-hospitalist group and the AMU hospitalist group. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality (IHM), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), ED-LOS and unscheduled readmission rates were defined as patient outcomes and compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the non-hospitalist group, the AMU hospitalist group had lower IHM (OR: 0.43, p<0.001), a lower ICU admission rate (OR: 0.72, p=0.013), a shorter LOS (coefficient: -0.984, SE: 0.318; p=0.002) and a shorter ED-LOS (coefficient: -3.021, SE: 0.256; p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the 10-day or 30-day readmission rates (p=0.974, p=0.965, respectively).
conclusionsThe AMU hospitalist care model was associated with reductions in IHM, ICU admission rate, LOS and ED-LOS. These findings suggest that the AMU hospitalist care model has the potential to be adopted into other healthcare systems to improve care for patients with acute medical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.