Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37536749›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology2023

Endoscope-Assisted Hairline Approach for Head and Neck Masses: A Review.

Min Seok Song, Seung Hoon Woo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min Seok SongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
Seung Hoon WooDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Funding

Dankook Institute of Medicine and OpticsDankook UniversityKorea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Education RS-2023-00247651Ministry of Food and Drug Safety KMDF_PR_20200901_0027-03Ministry of Health and Welfare HI20C2088Ministry of Science and ICTMinistry of Trade, Industry and EnergyNational Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A6A1A03043283National Research Foundation of Korea 2023K1A4A3 A02057280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional surgery through a transcervical incision is indicated for the treatment of certain tumors in the head and neck. However, this method can cause multiple problems, including scarring and cosmetic concerns. The endoscope-assisted hairline approach, which serves as an alternative to conventional surgical procedures, is gaining popularity due to its excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes. However, given the anatomical complexity involved, the endoscope-assisted hairline technique is not frequently employed in head and neck surgery. The evolution of the hairline surgical approach has been influenced by changes in disease conditions and recent advances in surgical tools. This review article discusses the use of endoscope-assisted hairline approaches in the resection of head and neck masses, focusing on the surgical procedure and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

EndoscopeHair Line IncisionHead and NeckScarSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37536749
PMCPMC10710923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.