Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37536669›Full record

SynthesisHealth promotion international2023

The effectiveness of community dance in people with cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eimear Nelson, Dervla Kelly, Orfhlaith Ni Bhriain, Fran Garry, Amanda M Clifford, Joanna M Allardyce

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences and perceived benefits of remotely delivered dance/movement therapy for adult cancer patients: a multi-method program evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eimear NelsonULCaN, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Dervla KellySchool of Medicine, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-001-9836-5400
Orfhlaith Ni BhriainIWAMD-Irish World Academy of Music and Dance, ULCaN, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-0408
Fran GarryIWAMD-Irish World Academy of Music and Dance, ULCaN, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-9694
Amanda M CliffordSchool of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0917-419X
Joanna M AllardyceSchool of Allied Health, ULCaN, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8052-6488
University of Limerick · IE

Funding

University of Limerick Cancer Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for both feasible and enjoyable physical activity programmes for people on a cancer journey. Emerging evidence suggests that dance can have a positive effect on health and well-being in this cohort. We aimed to synthesize the quantitative and qualitative literature exploring the effectiveness and impact of community dance interventions in people with all types and stages of cancer. A systematic search was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline Ovid, CINAHL and PEDro databases. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted and synthesized using a convergent segregated approach. The numeric data were analysed using descriptive statistics, narrative synthesis and meta-analysis where possible. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. The Downs and Black critical appraisal tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme were used to assess the quality of the quantitative and qualitative literature, respectively. Eighteen studies were included in this mixed-methods review with seven trials included in the meta-analysis. Statistically significant improvements were found in favour of community dance for functional capacity, fatigue, quality-of-life and depression in comparison to no intervention. Evidence suggests dance is a safe and feasible form of physical activity both during and after cancer treatment. Participants reported good social support, education regarding physical activity and local access as key facilitators to participation. We concluded that dance is a feasible and enjoyable intervention for many people with various forms of cancer. Community dance programmes can improve both physical and psychological outcomes in people on a cancer journey.

Indexed as

ExerciseNeoplasmsHumansQuality of Lifecancercommunity-based interventioncommunity health promotiondance interventionphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37536669
PMCPMC10400145
OpenAlexW4385564276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.