Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37536321›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2023

High-throughput bioprinting of the nasal epithelium using patient-derived nasal epithelial cells.

I Deniz Derman, Miji Yeo, Diana Cadena Castaneda, Megan Callender, Mian Horvath, Zengshuo Mo, Ruoyun Xiong, Elizabeth Fleming, Phylip Chen, Mark E Peeples and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Construction ofiScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

I Deniz DermanEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.
Miji YeoEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.
Diana Cadena CastanedaThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Megan CallenderThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Mian HorvathThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Zengshuo MoThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Ruoyun XiongThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Elizabeth FlemingThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Phylip ChenCenter for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, United States of America.
Mark E PeeplesCenter for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4582-317X
Karolina PaluckaThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.
Julia OhThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT 06032, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-7023
Ibrahim T OzbolatEngineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-4528
Jackson Laboratory · USPennsylvania State University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Technology Development Project - Increasing the complexity of ex vivo human airway models for studying immune response to viral infectionU19AI142733 · NIAID · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, Anna Karolina Palucka · 2019 to 2026
$23.1M
Metagenomes to Therapeutics: Defining the Rules for Engineering the Skin MicrobiomeDP2GM126893 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI OH, JULIA · 2017 to 2017
$2.8M
Molecular Mechanisms of Staphylococcus Epidermidis Strain DiversityR01AR078634 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI OH, JULIA · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
The UConn/JAX-GM Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG010463 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI Mark D ADAMS, Christine R Beck · 2020 to 2026
$1.5M
Skin Microbiome of Monogenic Skin DisordersR21AR075174 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI OH, JULIA · 2019 to 2022
$466k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010463NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI142733NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078634NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR075174NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM126893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progenitor human nasal epithelial cells (hNECs) are an essential cell source for the reconstruction of the respiratory pseudostratified columnar epithelium composed of multiple cell types in the context of infection studies and disease modeling. Hitherto, manual seeding has been the dominant method for creating nasal epithelial tissue models through biofabrication. However, this approach has limitations in terms of achieving the intricate three-dimensional (3D) structure of the natural nasal epithelium. 3D bioprinting has been utilized to reconstruct various epithelial tissue models, such as cutaneous, intestinal, alveolar, and bronchial epithelium, but there has been no attempt to use of 3D bioprinting technologies for reconstruction of the nasal epithelium. In this study, for the first time, we demonstrate the reconstruction of the nasal epithelium with the use of primary hNECs deposited on Transwell inserts via droplet-based bioprinting (DBB), which enabled high-throughput fabrication of the nasal epithelium in Transwell inserts of 24-well plates. DBB of progenitor hNECs ranging from one-tenth to one-half of the cell seeding density employed during the conventional cell seeding approach enabled a high degree of differentiation with the presence of cilia and tight-junctions over a 4 weeks air-liquid interface culture. Single cell RNA sequencing of these cultures identified five major epithelial cells populations, including basal, suprabasal, goblet, club, and ciliated cells. These cultures recapitulated the pseudostratified columnar epithelial architecture present in the native nasal epithelium and were permissive to respiratory virus infection. These results denote the potential of 3D bioprinting for high-throughput fabrication of nasal epithelial tissue models not only for infection studies but also for other purposes, such as disease modeling, immunological studies, and drug screening.

Indexed as

BioprintingCiliaEpithelial CellsHumansNasal MucosaRespiratory Mucosahigh-throughput bioprintinginfectionnasal epithelial cellsnasal epitheliumtissue models

Identifiers

PMID37536321
PMCPMC10424246
OpenAlexW4385520464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.