ArticleBJS open2023
'4-Check' protocol for intraoperative anastomotic assessment during transanal total mesorectal excision: retrospective cohort study.
Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- SAGES 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis for fluorescence image-guided gastrointestinal surgery using indocyanine green.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- SAGES 2025 guidelines for fluorescence image-guided gastrointestinal surgery using indocyanine green.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Pooled it
- Safety and Feasibility Colorectal Anastomosis Protocol Implementation: Results from the CASPI Single-Arm Pilot Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Conversion rate to open surgery during transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: a single-center experience.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage is a major complication following rectal cancer surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a protocol based on a quadruple intraoperative anastomotic assessment (4-Check) during transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
methodsPatients who underwent TaTME for rectal cancer with primary anastomosis were reviewed and divided into two groups: before (pre-4-Check: April 2015 - April 2019) and after the implementation of the 4-Check protocol (May 2019 - May 2022). This protocol consisted of a multimodal anastomotic integrity assessment, including indocyanine green-evaluation of colonic stump and intraluminal anastomosis perfusion, a reverse air leak test and anastomotic doughnuts assessment. The primary outcome was incidence of clinical and/or radiological anastomotic leakage. The secondary outcome included intraoperative anastomosis defects and repairs and 30-day complication rate. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were performed.
resultsOf 186 patients, 160 were selected: 86 patients in the pre-4-Check and 74 in the 4-Check group. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in postoperative anastomotic leakage (pre-4-Check versus 4-Check: 11.1 per cent versus 7.4 per cent; P = 0.50). However, in the 4-Check group, the intraoperative detection of defects and repairs was significantly increased (P = 0.03), and the number of complications was reduced (pre-4-Check versus 4-Check: 33.3 per cent versus 9.3 per cent, P = 0.004). Multivariable analyses confirmed that the use of the 4-Check protocol, the detection of anastomotic defects and increased albumin levels were associated with a reduced number of complications.
conclusionThe 4-Check protocol allowed the intraoperative detection and repair of anastomotic defects. Anastomotic leakage rates were not reduced; however, 30-day complication rates were lower after implementation of this protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.