SynthesisPLoS medicine2023
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07372495 (Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-genetic risk factors of miscarriage: a comprehensive umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions to prevent preterm birth following fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- Cervical Cerclage Performed at 24-32+0 Weeks in Twin Pregnancies: A Multicenter Descriptive Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Live Sextuplet Birth After Ovulation Induction in a Patient With Secondary Infertility: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Risk factors for preterm birth and prolonged pregnancy following cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective analysis and predictive model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Insufficiency in China (2026 Revision).Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Offspring According to Cerclage Placement in Twin Pregnancy: A National Cohort Study Over 15 Years.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Predictive value of uterine electromyography coupled with transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment in women at risk of preterm delivery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Pessary Placement, Cervical Cerclage, or Expectant Management in Preventing Preterm Delivery in Twin Pregnancies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Emergency double McDonald cerclage in twin gestation with single fetal death and simultaneous prolapse of both amniotic sacs.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating the safety and outcomes of third-trimester selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancies with discordant anomalies-a standardized approach for counseling.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Successful Late Emergency Cerclage for Painless Cervical Dilation in Triplet Gestation.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with early cervical shortening after cerclage: a single-center cohort study integrating C-reactive protein.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Combined Use of Elastography and Cervicometry With the E-Cervix Index to Predict Second Trimester Preterm Birth Risk.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2025Article
- Management of twin pregnancies: Remaining challenges and unanswered questions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Review
- Association between the timing of cervical cerclage placement and postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: international Delphi consensus.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Article
- A long-term retrospective analysis of oncologic and fertility outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical trachelectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Histologic Chorioamnionitis Among Women with Prenatal Fever During Preterm Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal approach to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in twins has not been fully established yet. Recent evidence suggests that placement of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with short cervical length at ultrasound or cervical dilatation at physical examination might be associated with a reduced risk of PTB. However, such evidence is based mainly on small studies thus questioning the robustness of these findings. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the role of cervical cerclage in preventing PTB and adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. METHODS AND
findingsKey databases searched and date of last search: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched electronically on 20 April 2023. Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were observational studies assessing the risk of PTB among twin pregnancies undergoing cerclage versus no cerclage and randomized trials in which twin pregnancies were allocated to cerclage for the prevention of PTB or to a control group (e.g., placebo or treatment as usual). The primary outcome was PTB <34 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were PTB <37, 32, 28, 24 weeks of gestation, gestational age at birth, the interval between diagnosis and birth, preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (pPROM), chorioamnionitis, perinatal loss, and perinatal morbidity. Subgroup analyses according to the indication for cerclage (short cervical length or cervical dilatation) were also performed. Risk of bias assessment: The risk of bias of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, while that of the observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Statistical analysis: Summary risk ratios (RRs) of the likelihood of detecting each categorical outcome in exposed versus unexposed women, and (b) summary mean differences (MDs) between exposed and unexposed women (for each continuous outcome), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using head-to-head meta-analyses. Synthesis of the results: Eighteen studies (1,465 twin pregnancies) were included. Placement of cervical cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a short cervix at ultrasound or cervical dilatation at physical examination was associated with a reduced risk of PTB <34 weeks of gestation (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.59, 0.91], p = 0.005 corresponding to a 16% difference in the absolute risk, AR), <32 (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.57, 0.84], p < 0.001; AR: 16.92%), <28 (RR: 0.54, 95% [CI 0.43, 0.67], 0.001; AR: 18.29%), and <24 (RR: 0.48, 95% CI [0.23, 0.97], p = 0.04; AR: 15.57%) weeks of gestation and a prolonged gestational age at birth (MD: 2.32 weeks, 95% [CI 0.99, 3.66], p < 0.001). Cerclage in twin pregnancy with short cervical length or cervical dilatation was also associated with a reduced risk of perinatal loss (RR: 0.38, 95% CI [0.25, 0.60], p < 0.001; AR: 19.62%) and composite adverse outcome (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = 0.007; AR: 11.75%). Cervical cerclage was associated with a reduced risk of PTB <34 weeks both in women with cervical length <15 mm (RR: 0.74, 95% CI [0.58, 0.95], p = 0.02; AR: 29.17%) and in those with cervical dilatation (RR: 0.68, 95% CI [0.57, 0.80], p < 0.001; AR: 35.02%). The association between cerclage and prevention of PTB and adverse perinatal outcomes was exclusively due to the inclusion of observational studies. The quality of retrieved evidence at GRADE assessment was low.
conclusionsEmergency cerclage for cervical dilation or short cervical length <15 mm may be potentially associated with a reduction in PTB and improved perinatal outcomes. However, these findings are mainly based upon observational studies and require confirmation in large and adequately powered RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.