ArticlePloS one2023
Transcriptomic analysis of biofilm formation in strains of Clostridioides difficile associated with recurrent and non-recurrent infection reveals potential candidate markers for recurrence.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Pefloxacin onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review of the Impact of Biofilm Formation on RecurrentMicroorganisms · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transcriptomic profile in a biofilm model of ribotypes (RT) 001 and 027 associated with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (R-CDI) and not associated with recurrent (NR)-CDI was analyzed to identify genes that may favor the recurrence. Twenty strains were selected, 10 RT001 and 10 RT027. From each ribotype, 5 were R-CDI and 5 NR-CDI. Biofilm and nonadherent cells were prepared from each clinical isolate, and the RNA was extracted. RNA samples were pooled in 8 combinations implying ribotype, recurrence, and biofilm formation. Each pool was separately labeled with Cy3 dye and hybridized on a microarray designed for this study. Slides were scanned, analyzed, and gene expression was compared between unique and grouped pools using the Student's t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction when appropriate. Validation was carried out by qRT-PCR for selected genes. Results: After comparisons of differentially expressed genes from both ribotypes of R-CDI strains (nonadherent cells vs. biofilm) and both ribotypes in biofilm (R-CDI vs. NR-CDI), we found 3 genes over-expressed and 1 under-expressed in common (adj. p ≤ 0.05). Overexpressed genes were CAJ70148 (a putative dehydrogenase), CAJ68100 (a secretion type II system protein from the GspH (pseudopilins) family), and CAJ69725 (a putative membrane protein); under-expressed was CAJ68151 (a segregation and condensation protein A). Because CAJ70148, CAJ68100, CAJ69725 and CAJ68151 were differentially expressed in biofilm in strains associated with R-CDI, they may support the biofilm favoring the recurrence of CDI. However, further studies will be needed for poorly studied genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.