Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535658›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Patient, family member, and health care provider perspective on barriers and facilitators to diabetic retinopathy screening in Thailand: A qualitative study.

Geetha Kumar, Saranya Velu, Shahina Pardhan, Raju Sapkota, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Mongkol Tadarati, Peranut Chotcomwongse, Variya Nganthavee, Warisara Pattanapongpaiboon, Rajiv Raman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Geetha KumarShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saranya VeluShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Raju SapkotaVision and Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-7037
Paisan RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mongkol TadaratiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Peranut ChotcomwongseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Variya NganthaveeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warisara PattanapongpaiboonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rajiv RamanShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-0233
Rajavithi Hospital · THSankara Nethralaya · INAnglia Ruskin University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDiabetic retinopathy (DR) can cause significant visual impairment which can be largely avoided by early detection through proper screening and treatment. People with DR face a number of challenges from early detection to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate factors that influence DR screening in Thailand and to identify barriers to follow-up compliance from patient, family member, and health care provider (HCP) perspectives.

methodsA total of 15 focus group discussions (FGDs) were held, each with five to twelve participants. There were three distinct stakeholders: diabetic patients (n = 47) presenting to a diabetic retinopathy clinic in Thailand, their family members (n = 41), and health care providers (n = 34). All focus group conversations were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to examine textual material.

resultsDifferent themes emerged from the FGD on knowledge about diabetes, self-care behaviors of diabetes mellitus (DM), awareness about DR, barriers to DR screening, and the suggested solutions to address those barriers. Data showed lower knowledge and awareness about diabetes and DR in both patients and family members. Long waiting times, financial issues, and lack of a person to accompany appointments were identified as the major deterrents for attending DR screening. Family support for patients was found to vary widely, with some patients reporting to have received adequate support while others reported having received minimal support. Even though insurance covered the cost of attending diabetes/DR screening program, some patients did not show up for their appointments.

conclusionPatients need to be well-informed about the asymptomatic nature of diabetes and DR. Communication at the patient level and shared decision-making with HCPs are essential. Family members and non-physician clinicians (such as diabetes nurses, diabetes educators, physician assistants) who work in the field of diabetes play a vital role in encouraging patients to attend diabetes and DR follow-ups visits regularly.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyFamilyHealth PersonnelHumansMass ScreeningPatient ComplianceThailand

Identifiers

PMID37535658
PMCPMC10399890
OpenAlexW4385521383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.