Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Impact of vaccination on infection or death from COVID-19 in individuals with laboratory-confirmed cases: Case-control study.

Porfirio Felipe Hernández Bautista, Concepción Grajales Muñiz, David Alejandro Cabrera Gaytán, Teresita Rojas Mendoza, Alfonso Vallejos Parás, Clara Esperanza Santacruz Tinoco, Julio Elias Alvarado Yaah, Yu Mei Anguiano Hernández, Nancy Sandoval Gutiérrez, Leticia Jaimes Betancourt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Epidemiological surveillance at IMSS: a review of institutional successes].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Porfirio Felipe Hernández BautistaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Concepción Grajales MuñizInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
David Alejandro Cabrera GaytánInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5314-4786
Teresita Rojas MendozaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Alfonso Vallejos ParásInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Coahuila, Mexico.
Clara Esperanza Santacruz TinocoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Julio Elias Alvarado YaahInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Yu Mei Anguiano HernándezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Nancy Sandoval GutiérrezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Calidad de Insumos y Laboratorios Especializados, Coahuila, Mexico.
Leticia Jaimes BetancourtInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 7., Coahuila, Mexico.
Mexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study is to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in people treated within the social security system whose vaccination status was reported to the epidemiological surveillance system. STUDY

designCase-control study.

methodsThis was a case-control study conducted. The records of individuals with suspected cases of COVID-19 registered in the epidemiological surveillance system between February 1 and June 30, 2021, were studied. RT-qPCR was performed to determine SARS-CoV-2 infection; those with a positive result were considered cases, and those with a negative result were considered controls. The ratio between cases and controls was 1:1.3. The crude and adjusted vaccine effectiveness was considered the prevention of symptomatic infection and death and calculated as the difference between the dose and the risk, with a survival analysis among vaccinated people.

resultsA total of 94,416 individuals were included, of whom 40,192 were considered cases and 54,224 controls; 3,781 (4.00%) had been vaccinated against COVID-19. Vaccination also proved to be a protective factor against COVID-19, especially in the population who received a second dose (OR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.28-0.35). With the application of the vaccine, there was a protective effect against mortality (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.66-0.87). Disease prevention was higher for the BNT162-2 mRNA vaccine (82%) followed by the ChAdOx1 vaccine (33%). In the survival analysis, vaccination provided a protective effect.

conclusionsThere was a positive impact of vaccines for the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19, with a second dose generating greater efficacy and a reduction in deaths.

Indexed as

COVID-19BNT162 VaccineCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37535644
PMCPMC10399771
OpenAlexW4385525191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.