Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535497›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2023

Epigenetic regulation of nuclear processes in fungal plant pathogens.

H Martin Kramer, David E Cook, Michael F Seidl, Bart P H J Thomma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Functional Analysis of MaizePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enhanced oxidative stress resistance in Ustilago maydis and its implications on the virulence.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

H Martin KramerLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
David E CookLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Michael F SeidlLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Bart P H J ThommaLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-4181
Kansas State University · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUtrecht University · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through the association of protein complexes to DNA, the eukaryotic nuclear genome is broadly organized into open euchromatin that is accessible for enzymes acting on DNA and condensed heterochromatin that is inaccessible. Chemical and physical alterations to chromatin may impact its organization and functionality and are therefore important regulators of nuclear processes. Studies in various fungal plant pathogens have uncovered an association between chromatin organization and expression of in planta-induced genes that are important for pathogenicity. This review discusses chromatin-based regulation mechanisms as determined in the fungal plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae and relates the importance of epigenetic transcriptional regulation and other nuclear processes more broadly in fungal plant pathogens.

Indexed as

AscomycotaVerticilliumCell NucleusEpigenesis, GeneticEuchromatinFungal ProteinsPlant DiseasesEuchromatinFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37535497
PMCPMC10399791
OpenAlexW4385542133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.