Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535416›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Effectiveness of an Emergency Department-Based Machine Learning Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Outpatient Falls Among Older Adults: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Daniel J Hekman, Amy L Cochran, Apoorva P Maru, Hanna J Barton, Manish N Shah, Douglas Wiegmann, Maureen A Smith, Frank Liao, Brian W Patterson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05810064 (Preventing Future Falls in Older Adult ED Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05810064 recruitingnot on this map

Preventing Future Falls in Older Adult ED Patients: Evaluating the Implementation and Effectiveness of a Novel Automated Screening and Referral Intervention - Assessing Outcomes From Medical Records and Medicare Claims Data

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2022 to 2026Enrolled30,000ConditionsFalls-RiskArmsFalls-Risk Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J HekmanBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-9501
Amy L CochranDepartment of Population Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-796X
Apoorva P MaruBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-6446
Hanna J BartonDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0457-1153
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-1074
Douglas WiegmannDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-9853
Maureen A SmithHealth Innovation Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4370-000X
Frank LiaoDepartment of Applied Data Science, UWHealth Hospitals and Clinics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-7530
Brian W PattersonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-3808
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency CareK24AG054560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2017 to 2021
$955k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS027735NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) providers are important collaborators in preventing falls for older adults because they are often the first health care providers to see a patient after a fall and because at-home falls are often preceded by previous ED visits. Previous work has shown that ED referrals to falls interventions can reduce the risk of an at-home fall by 38%. Screening patients at risk for a fall can be time-consuming and difficult to implement in the ED setting. Machine learning (ML) and clinical decision support (CDS) offer the potential of automating the screening process. However, it remains unclear whether automation of screening and referrals can reduce the risk of future falls among older patients.

objectiveThe goal of this paper is to describe a research protocol for evaluating the effectiveness of an automated screening and referral intervention. These findings will inform ongoing discussions about the use of ML and artificial intelligence to augment medical decision-making.

methodsTo assess the effectiveness of our program for patients receiving the falls risk intervention, our primary analysis will be to obtain referral completion rates at 3 different EDs. We will use a quasi-experimental design known as a sharp regression discontinuity with regard to intent-to-treat, since the intervention is administered to patients whose risk score falls above a threshold. A conditional logistic regression model will be built to describe 6-month fall risk at each site as a function of the intervention, patient demographics, and risk score. The odds ratio of a return visit for a fall and the 95% CI will be estimated by comparing those identified as high risk by the ML-based CDS (ML-CDS) and those who were not but had a similar risk profile.

resultsThe ML-CDS tool under study has been implemented at 2 of the 3 EDs in our study. As of April 2023, a total of 1326 patient encounters have been flagged for providers, and 339 unique patients have been referred to the mobility and falls clinic. To date, 15% (45/339) of patients have scheduled an appointment with the clinic.

conclusionsThis study seeks to quantify the impact of an ML-CDS intervention on patient behavior and outcomes. Our end-to-end data set allows for a more meaningful analysis of patient outcomes than other studies focused on interim outcomes, and our multisite implementation plan will demonstrate applicability to a broad population and the possibility to adapt the intervention to other EDs and achieve similar results. Our statistical methodology, regression discontinuity design, allows for causal inference from observational data and a staggered implementation strategy allows for the identification of secular trends that could affect causal associations and allow mitigation as necessary.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05810064; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05810064. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48128.

Indexed as

automated screeningclinical decision supportemergency medicinefallsgeriatricsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37535416
PMCPMC10436111
OpenAlexW4377821039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.