ArticlemBio2023
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preventing COVID-19 during the Omicron surge: retrospective analysis of National Veterans Health Administration electronic data.
Article in mBio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling protection: a meta-analysis of tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis in 28,950 transplant recipients and immunocompromised patients against COVID-19.Virology journal · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Repeat Dosing of Long-Acting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (AZD7442): Results from the PROVENT Sub-study.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Trial
- A SARS-CoV-2 variant‑adjusted threshold of protection model for monoclonal antibody pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Dose-dependent impact of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as primary prevention against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised individuals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Immunogenicity and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised 20 to <40 kg children and adolescents: A pilot, prospective, open-labeled study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Real-world clinical outcomes of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the Omicron outbreak in China: baseline characteristics and interim analysis of the CLEAR study.Virology journal · 2024Observational
- COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy in Participants With Weakened Immune Systems From 4 Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections among recipients of tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis: A citywide real-world effectiveness study.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024Article
- VA Big Data Science: A Model for Improved National Pandemic Response Present and Future.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Prevention in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Current State of the Evidence.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 in Children.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023Review
- [Tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylactic treatment against SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplantation patients].Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia · 2023Article
- Expert Consensus on Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection in Patients with Lung Cancer.Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023Article
- A Review of the Currently Available Antibody Therapy for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted serology test results and their association with subsequent COVID-19-related outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The effect of tixagevimab-cilgavimab on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis.The Journal of infection · 2023Article
- Impact of Sars-CoV-2 Prophylaxis with Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab in High-Risk Patients with B-Cell Malignancies: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis and Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Experience.Viruses · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known regarding the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated immunocompromised patients, particularly after the emergence of the Omicron variant. In this retrospective cohort study with exact matching and propensity score adjustment within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, we selected immunocompromised veterans age ≥18 years as of 1 January 2022, receiving VA healthcare. We compared a cohort of 1,878 patients treated with at least one dose of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab to 7,014 matched controls selected from patients who met study criteria but were not treated. Patients were followed through 15 June 2022, or until death, whichever occurred earlier. The primary outcome was a composite of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for the association between receipt of tixagevimab/cilgavimab and outcomes. Most (73%) tixagevimab/cilgavimab recipients were ≥65 years old, and 80% had ≥3 mRNA vaccine doses or two doses of Ad26.COV2. Compared to matched controls, recipients had a lower incidence of the composite COVID-19 outcome (49/1,878 [2.6%] versus 312/7,014 [4.4%]; HR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52), and individually SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), COVID-19 hospitalization (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55). In conclusion, tixagevimab/cilgavimab was associated with lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 during the Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.2.12.1 surge. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 remains an ongoing global health crisis that justifies continued efforts to validate and expand, when possible, knowledge on the efficacy of available vaccines and treatments. Clinical trials have been limited due to fast tracking of medications for mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic for the general population. We present a real-world analysis, using electronic health record data, of the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for the prevention of COVID-19 infection in the unique population of U.S. veterans. Unlike those in the PROVENT clinical trial from which the emergency use authorization for tixagevimab/cilgavimab as a preventative treatment arose, the veterans population is highly immunocompromised and nearly 96% totally vaccinated. These demographics allowed us to analyze the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in preventing COVID-19 under different conditions in a more fragile population than that of the initial clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.