Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535398›Full record

ArticlemBio2023

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preventing COVID-19 during the Omicron surge: retrospective analysis of National Veterans Health Administration electronic data.

Yinong Young-Xu, Lauren Epstein, Vincent C Marconi, Victoria Davey, Caroline Korves, Gabrielle Zwain, Jeremy Smith, Fran Cunningham, Robert A Bonomo, Adit A Ginde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy in Participants With Weakened Immune Systems From 4 Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections among recipients of tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis: A citywide real-world effectiveness study.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Article
  11. VA Big Data Science: A Model for Improved National Pandemic Response Present and Future.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 in Children.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yinong Young-XuUS Department of Veterans Affairs, PBM, Center for Medication Safety , Hines, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-3352
Lauren EpsteinAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Vincent C MarconiAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Victoria DaveyUS Department of Veteran's Affairs, Office of Research and Development , Washington, DC, USA.
Caroline KorvesWhite River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CEP , White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Gabrielle ZwainWhite River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CEP , White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Jeremy SmithWhite River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CEP , White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Fran CunninghamUS Department of Veterans Affairs, PBM, Center for Medication Safety , Hines, Illinois, USA.
Robert A BonomoUS Department of Veterans Affairs, VA SHIELD, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System , Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3299-894X
Adit A GindeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado, USA.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USWhite River Junction VA Medical Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known regarding the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated immunocompromised patients, particularly after the emergence of the Omicron variant. In this retrospective cohort study with exact matching and propensity score adjustment within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, we selected immunocompromised veterans age ≥18 years as of 1 January 2022, receiving VA healthcare. We compared a cohort of 1,878 patients treated with at least one dose of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab to 7,014 matched controls selected from patients who met study criteria but were not treated. Patients were followed through 15 June 2022, or until death, whichever occurred earlier. The primary outcome was a composite of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for the association between receipt of tixagevimab/cilgavimab and outcomes. Most (73%) tixagevimab/cilgavimab recipients were ≥65 years old, and 80% had ≥3 mRNA vaccine doses or two doses of Ad26.COV2. Compared to matched controls, recipients had a lower incidence of the composite COVID-19 outcome (49/1,878 [2.6%] versus 312/7,014 [4.4%]; HR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52), and individually SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), COVID-19 hospitalization (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55). In conclusion, tixagevimab/cilgavimab was associated with lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 during the Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.2.12.1 surge. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 remains an ongoing global health crisis that justifies continued efforts to validate and expand, when possible, knowledge on the efficacy of available vaccines and treatments. Clinical trials have been limited due to fast tracking of medications for mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic for the general population. We present a real-world analysis, using electronic health record data, of the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for the prevention of COVID-19 infection in the unique population of U.S. veterans. Unlike those in the PROVENT clinical trial from which the emergency use authorization for tixagevimab/cilgavimab as a preventative treatment arose, the veterans population is highly immunocompromised and nearly 96% totally vaccinated. These demographics allowed us to analyze the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in preventing COVID-19 under different conditions in a more fragile population than that of the initial clinical trial.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalElectronicsHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesVeterans HealthAntibodies, MonoclonalcilgavimabtixagevimabCOVID-19monoclonal antibodiespreventionpropensity score matchingreal-world dataSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37535398
PMCPMC10470809
OpenAlexW4385514865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.