Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535310›Full record

ArticleAmbio2023

Effect of forest management choices on carbon sequestration and biodiversity at national scale.

Annikki Mäkelä, Francesco Minunno, Heini Kujala, Anna-Kaisa Kosenius, Risto K Heikkinen, Virpi Junttila, Mikko Peltoniemi, Martin Forsius

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annikki MäkeläInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) & Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-7350
Francesco MinunnoInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) & Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Heini KujalaFinnish Natural History Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna-Kaisa KoseniusDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Risto K HeikkinenFinnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.
Virpi JunttilaFinnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko PeltoniemiNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Martin ForsiusFinnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

H2020 Research Infrastructures 871128HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science 101000574Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 347848Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 347863Maa- ja MetsätalousministeriÖ VN/28536/2020Strategic Research Council 312559Strategic Research Council 335958Ympäristöministeriö VN/5082/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest management methods and harvest intensities influence wood production, carbon sequestration and biodiversity. We devised different management scenarios by means of stakeholder analysis and incorporated them in the forest growth simulator PREBAS. To analyse impacts of harvest intensity, we used constraints on total harvest: business as usual, low harvest, intensive harvest and no harvest. We carried out simulations on a wall-to-wall grid in Finland until 2050. Our objectives were to (1) test how the management scenarios differed in their projections, (2) analyse the potential wood production, carbon sequestration and biodiversity under the different harvest levels, and (3) compare different options of allocating the scenarios and protected areas. Harvest level was key to carbon stocks and fluxes regardless of management actions and moderate changes in proportion of strictly protected forest. In contrast, biodiversity was more dependent on other management variables than harvesting levels, and relatively independent of carbon stocks and fluxes.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCarbon SequestrationConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsFinlandCarbon sequestrationForest structureHarvest levelPhotosynthesisSimulation

Identifiers

PMID37535310
PMCPMC10562327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.