ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023
Biomechanical analysis of a novel screw system with a variable locking angle in mandible angle fractures.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Finite element analysis of the human mandible: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the essential input parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Mechanical Performance of Monoaxial Versus Polyaxial Locked Plates for Bone Fracture Repair: A Review.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Review
- Finite element analysis of mandibular fracture fixation authenticated by 3D printed mandible mechanical testing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locking plates nowadays represent an important treatment in bone trauma and bone healing due to its strong biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to both computationally and experimentally validate a novel screw locking system by comparing it to another locking system from state-of-the-art and to apply it in an environment of a fractured mandible. FEA was used to test both systems prior to experimental tests. The systems were locked in the plate holes at 0°, 10°, 15°, and 20°. Cyclic bending tests and push-out tests were performed in order to determine the stiffness and push-out forces of both locking systems. Finally, newly designed locking system was implemented in mandibular angle fracture. Control locking system was biomechanically superior in push-out test, but with no greater significance. In contrast, the new locking system showed greater stiffness by 17.3% at the deflection angle of 20° in cyclic tests, with lower values for other deflection angles. Similar values were displayed in fractured mandible angle environment. Greater stiffness of the new locking system in cyclic loading tests, together with polyaxiallity of the new locking screw, could lead to easier application and improved biomechanical stability of the mandible angle fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.