Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535255›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Voluntary Assisted Dying/Euthanasia: Will This Have an Impact on Cancer Care in Future Years?

Jennifer Philip, Brian Le, Camille La Brooy, Ian Olver, Ian Kerridge, Paul Komesaroff

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria Pde, Fitzroy 3065, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. jphilip@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-0645
Brian LeDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria Pde, Fitzroy 3065, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Camille La BrooyPublic Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Monash, Victoria, Australia.
Ian OlverUniversity of Notre Dame of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ian KerridgeHaematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Paul KomesaroffMonash University, Monash, Vic, Australia.
Monash University · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementIn considering the impact of medically hastened death (MHD) on cancer care, a wide range of variables needs to be considered including demographic factors, diagnoses, local cultural factors, and the legislative frameworks in place. Here, we present a synthesis of recently available published literature and empirical data collected following legislative change to enable MHD in Victoria, Australia to explore in detail the potential impact of MHD on cancer care with a focus on patients/families and professional groups. Our findings reveal that for patients and families, both physical and existential distress frequently underlie MHD requests, with the latter less readily recognised by health professionals. The responses of those around the patient making the request may have a very significant impact on relationships within families and upon the nature of the subsequent bereavement. For palliative care, while differing views may remain, it appears that there has been some accommodation of MHD into or alongside practice over time. The recognition of a shared commitment to relief of suffering of palliative care and MHD appears a helpful means of establishing how these practices may co-exist. In cancer practice more broadly, as individual professionals reflect upon their own roles, new relationships and pathways of patient movement (or referral) must be established in response to patients' requests. Our findings also highlight many unanswered questions in understanding the impact of MHD, including that upon those dying who choose not to access MHD, First Nations peoples, the participating health professionals' longer term, and the relief of suffering itself. A systematic approach to the evaluation of MHD legislation must be adopted in order to understand its full impact. Only then could it be determined if the aspirations for such legislative change were being met.

Indexed as

Euthanasia, Active, VoluntaryNeoplasmsSuicide, AssistedHumansPalliative CareTerminal CareCancerEuthanasiaMedically hastened deathPalliative careVoluntary assisted dying

Identifiers

PMID37535255
PMCPMC10547610
OpenAlexW4385513831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.