Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535197›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery.

Adrian Franke, Elisabeth Claudia Hofmann, Anna Steinberg, Günter Lauer, Hagen Kitzler, Henry Leonhardt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian FrankeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01304, Dresden, Germany. adrian.franke@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9324-9574
Elisabeth Claudia HofmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01304, Dresden, Germany.
Anna SteinbergDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01304, Dresden, Germany.
Günter LauerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01304, Dresden, Germany.
Hagen KitzlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Henry LeonhardtDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01304, Dresden, Germany.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSymmetry is essential for computer-aided surgical (CAS) procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). A critical step for successful CAS is mirroring the unaffected side to create a template for the virtual reconstruction of the injured anatomical structure. The aim was to identify specific anatomical landmarks of the midfacial skeleton, to evaluate the symmetry in a group of the real-world Central European population, and to use these landmarks to assess midfacial symmetry in CT scans. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe retrospective cross-sectional study defined landmarks of the midface's bony contour using viscerocranial CT data. The distances of the skeletal landmarks (e.g., the frontozygomatic suture and temporozygomatic suture) of the left and right sides from the midline were measured and statistically compared. Midfacial symmetry for reference points was defined as a difference within 0 mm and their mean difference plus one standard deviation.

resultsWe examined a total of 101 CT scans. 75% of our population shows symmetrical proportions of the midface. The means of the differences for the left and right sides ranged from 0.8 to 1.3 mm, averaging 1.1 ± 0.2 mm for all skeletal landmarks. The standard deviations ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 mm, with a computed mean of 0.9 ± 0.3 mm.

conclusionWe established a methodology to assess the symmetry of the bony midface. If the determined differences were equal to or lower than 2.5 mm in the mentioned midfacial skeletal landmarks, then the symmetry of the bony midface was considered present, and symmetry-based methods for CAS procedures are applicable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many CAS procedures require facial symmetry. We provide an easy-to-apply method to probe for symmetry of the midface. The method may be used for population-based research, to check for proper reduction of fractures after reposition or to screen for symmetry prior to CAS planning.

Indexed as

Surgery, Computer-AssistedSurgery, OralCross-Sectional StudiesFaceImaging, Three-DimensionalRetrospective StudiesSkullComputer tomographyMaxillofacialMidfacePatient-specific implantSymmetry

Identifiers

PMID37535197
PMCPMC10492674
OpenAlexW4385514348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.