Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535176›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

Can a Therapeutic Strategy for Hypotension Improve Cerebral Perfusion and Oxygenation in an Experimental Model of Hemorrhagic Shock and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?

Ana Paula de Carvalho Canela Balzi, Denise Aya Otsuki, Lucia Andrade, Wellingson Paiva, Felipe Lima Souza, Luiz Guilherme Cernaglia Aureliano, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula de Carvalho Canela BalziAnesthesiology Department, Hospital das Clinicas SP, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. ana.canela@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-1712
Denise Aya OtsukiMedical Research Laboratory -LIM-08, Anesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucia AndradeNephrology Department, Hospital das Clinicas SP, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson PaivaNeurosurgery Department, Hospital das Clinicas SP, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Lima SouzaMedical Research Laboratory, Nephrology Department, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Guilherme Cernaglia AurelianoPathology Department, Hospital das Clinicas SP, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Marcelo Sá MalbouissonAnesthesiology Department, Hospital das Clinicas SP, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/07832-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestoration of brain tissue perfusion is a determining factor in the neurological evolution of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic shock (HS). In a porcine model of HS without neurological damage, it was observed that the use of fluids or vasoactive drugs was effective in restoring brain perfusion; however, only terlipressin promoted restoration of cerebral oxygenation and lower expression of edema and apoptosis markers. It is unclear whether the use of vasopressor drugs is effective and beneficial during situations of TBI. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of resuscitation with saline solution and terlipressin on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in a model of TBI and HS.

methodsThirty-two pigs weighing 20-30 kg were randomly allocated into four groups: control (no treatment), saline (60 ml/kg of 0.9% NaCl), terlipressin (2 mg of terlipressin), and saline plus terlipressin (20 ml/kg of 0.9% NaCl + 2 mg of terlipressin). Brain injury was induced by lateral fluid percussion, and HS was induced through pressure-controlled bleeding, aiming at a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mmHg. After 30 min of circulatory shock, resuscitation strategies were initiated according to the group. The systemic and cerebral hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters, lactate levels, and hemoglobin levels were evaluated. The data were subjected to analysis of variance for repeated measures. The significance level established for statistical analysis was p < 0.05.

resultsThe terlipressin and saline plus terlipressin groups showed an increase in MAP that lasted until the end of the experiment (p < 0.05). There was a notable increase in intracranial pressure in all groups after starting treatment for shock. Cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral oximetry showed no improvement after hemodynamic recovery in any group. The groups that received saline at resuscitation had the lowest hemoglobin concentrations after treatment.

conclusionsThe treatment of hypotension in HS with saline and/or terlipressin cannot restore cerebral perfusion or oxygenation in experimental models of HS and severe TBI. Elevated MAP raises intracranial pressure owing to brain autoregulation dysfunction caused by TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHypotensionShock, HemorrhagicAnimalsCerebrovascular CirculationDisease Models, AnimalHemoglobinsHumansModels, TheoreticalOximetryPerfusionResuscitationSaline SolutionSwineTerlipressinHemoglobinsSaline SolutionTerlipressinAdvanced trauma life support careBrain injuriesCerebrovascular circulationHemorrhagicIsotonic solutionsShockTraumaticVasoconstrictor agents

Identifiers

PMID37535176
OpenAlexW4385507284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.