Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535146›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2023

Uninformed Origins: Should We Be Advising Parents on the Source of Medicines and Therapies?

Tara E Ness, Zachary J Tabb, Janet Malek, Frank X Placencia

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tara E Ness *Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. tara.ness@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-418X
Zachary J Tabb *Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Janet MalekBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Frank X PlacenciaBaylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respecting patient autonomy through the process of soliciting informed consent is a cornerstone of clinical ethics. In pediatrics, until a child becomes an adult or legally emancipated, that ethical tenet takes the form of respect for parental decision-making authority. In instances of respecting religious beliefs, doing so is not always apparent and sometimes the challenge lies not only in the healthcare provider's familiarity of religious restrictions but also their knowledge of medical interventions themselves which might conflict with those restrictions. We examine a case of a newborn receiving animal-derived surfactant, a common scenario in neonatology, and present considerations for providers to weigh when confronting when such an intervention might conflict with parent's religious beliefs. We end with strategizing ways to address this issue as a medical community.

Indexed as

NeonatologyParentsDecision MakingHumansInfant, NewbornInformed ConsentAnimal-derived productsAutonomyConsentPediatrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.