Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535143›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

Feasibility of vertical force-velocity profiles to monitor changes in muscle function following different fatigue protocols.

Zhaoqian Li, Peng Zhi, Zhi Yuan, Amador García-Ramos, Mark King

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaoqian LiDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. lzqf3ng@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5599-0257
Peng ZhiFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Zhi YuanSports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Amador García-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Mark KingSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

Funding

University Postgraduate Programme 202308390053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to explore the feasibility of vertical force-velocity (F-V) profiles to monitor changes in muscle function following different fatigue protocols. The between-day reliability of vertical F-V profiles and the acute effects of two fatigue protocols on the changes of lower limb muscle function were examined.

methodsTwelve resistance trained males completed a preliminary session to determine their back squat one-repetition maximum (1RM). Afterwards, they randomly performed two experimental sessions that only differed in the fatigue protocol applied: heavy-load traditional (HLT; five repetitions at 80% 1RM) and light-load ballistic (LLB; five repetitions at 30% 1RM) squat protocols. Participants' vertical F-V profiles (maximum theoretical force [F

resultsF

conclusionsThe vertical F-V profile can be used to monitor changes in muscle function given its acceptable between-day reliability and its high sensitivity to detect the acute effect of force-oriented and velocity-oriented fatigue protocols on specific maximal neuromuscular capacities.

Indexed as

Muscle FatigueResistance TrainingFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMusclesMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsForce–velocity relationshipMuscle functionResistance trainingSquat

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.