ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2024
Prospective use of molecular minimal residual disease for risk stratification in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia : Long-term results of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 trial in Austria.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of favorable subgroups of pediatric high-hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia-A retrospective multinational study.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Article
- Early detection and better outcomes: molecular approaches in pediatric hematologic malignancies - a review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since 1979 Austrian children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have been treated according to protocols of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) study group. The Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica and BFM (AIEOP-BFM) ALL 2000 study was designed to prospectively study patient stratification into three risk groups using minimal residual disease (MRD) on two time points during the patient's early disease course. The MRD levels were monitored by detection of clone-specific rearrangements of the immunoglobulin and T‑cell receptor genes applying a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based technique. The 7‑year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates for all 608 Austrian patients treated between June 1999 and December 2009 within the AIEOP-BFM 2000 study were 84 ± 2% and 91 ± 1%, respectively, with a median observation time of 6.58 years. Event-free survival for patients with precursor B‑cell and T‑cell ALL were 84 ± 2% (n = 521) and 84 ± 4% (n = 87; p = 0.460), respectively. The MRD assessment was feasible in 94% of the patients and allowed the definition of precursor B‑cell ALL patients with a low, intermediate or high risk of relapse even on top of clinically relevant subgroups. A similar finding with respect to MRD relevance in T‑ALL patients was not possible due to the small number of patients and events. Since this pivotal international AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 trial, molecular response to treatment has been continuously used with additional refinements to stratify patients into different risk groups in all successive trials of the AIEOP-BFM ALL study group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37535134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.