Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37535095›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

Sacroiliac versus transiliac-transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a biomechanical comparison.

Raffael Cintean, Cornelius Fritzsche, Ivan Zderic, Boyko Gueorguiev-Rüegg, Florian Gebhard, Konrad Schütze

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of preoperative screw planning and X-ray simulation for iliosacral and transsacral screw placement.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Comparative study on implantation safety and stability of SZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Pelvis/acetabulum: management of geriatric injuries.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Iliosacral screw osteosynthesis - state of the art.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025
    Review
  16. Mortality After Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffael CinteanDepartment of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. raffael.cintean@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8176-5774
Cornelius FritzscheDepartment of Handsurgery, Upper Extremities and Foot Surgery, Krankenhaus Waldfriede, Argentinische Allee 40, 14163, Berlin, Germany.
Ivan ZdericAO Research Institute (ARI), Clavandelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Boyko Gueorguiev-RüeggAO Research Institute (ARI), Clavandelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Florian GebhardDepartment of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Konrad SchützeDepartment of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEAO Foundation · CHKrankenhaus Waldfriede · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic fractures were often associated with high-energy trauma in young patients, but data show a significant increase in osteoporotic pelvic fractures in old age due to the progressive demographic change. There is an ongoing discussion about the best fixation techniques, which are ranging from lumbopelvic fixation to sacral bars or long transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screws. This study analyzes TITS screw osteosynthesis and sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis (SI), according to biomechanical criteria of fracture stability in osteoporotic human pelvic cadavers ex vivo.

methodsTen osteoporotic cadaveric pelvises were randomized into two groups of 5 pelvises each. An FFP-IIc fracture was initially placed unilaterally and subsequently surgically treated with a navigated SI screw or a TITS screw. The fractured side was loaded in a one-leg stance test setup until failure. Interfragmentary movements were assessed by means of optical motion tracking.

resultsNo significant difference in axial stiffness were found between the SI and the TITS screws (21.2 ± 4.9 N and 18.4 ± 4.1 N, p = 0.662). However, there was a significantly higher stability of the fracture treatment in the cohort with TITS-screws for gap angle, flexion, vertical movement and overall stability. The most significant difference in the cycle interval was between 6.000 and 10.000 for the gap angle (1.62 ± 0.25° versus 4.60 ± 0.65°, p = 0.0001), for flexion (4.15 ± 0.39 mm versus 7.60 ± 0.81 mm, p = 0.0016), interval 11.000-15.000 for vertical shear movement (7.34 ± 0.51 mm versus 13.99 ± 0.97 mm, p < 0.0001) and total displacement (8.28 ± 0.66 mm versus 15.53 ± 1.07 mm, p < 0.0001) for the TITS and the SI screws.

conclusionsThe results of this biomechanical study suggest a clear trend towards greater fracture stability of the TITS screw with significantly reduced interfragmentary movement. The application of a TITS screw for the treatment of the osteoporotic pelvic ring fracture may be prioritized to ensure the best possible patient care.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporotic FracturesPelvic BonesBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPelvisSacrumBiomechanicalFragility fractureOsteoporotic pelvic fractureSacroiliac screw

Identifiers

PMID37535095
PMCPMC10728224
OpenAlexW4385514761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.