Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2024
Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of albuvirtide in healthy subjects after intravenous drip and bolus injection.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic efficacy of albuvirtide-based antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV who have low-level viremia and non-AIDS-defining malignancies: two case reports.Retrovirology · 2025Article
- New Therapies and Strategies to Curb HIV Infections with a Focus on Macrophages and Reservoirs.Viruses · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Albuvirtide (ABT) is the first long-acting HIV fusion inhibitor developed in China, blocking the invasion of HIV-1 virus into target cells. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability, and safety of ABT following a single intravenous (IV) bolus injection or intravenous drip in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-period, parallel phase I clinical trial was conducted. Thirty subjects were randomly divided into three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1. After an overnight fast, all subjects received a single dose of 320 mg ABT either by intravenous drip for 45 min (group A) or bolus injection for 0.5 min (group B), or bolus injection for 3 min (group C). ABT plasma concentrations were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Non-compartmental analysis was used to evaluate PK parameters. The median time to reach maximum concentration was 0.75 h in group A and 0.16 h in both groups B and C. Elimination half-life, mean residence time, apparent clearance, and apparent volume of distribution were similar among the three groups. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) of geometric mean ratios of PK parameters for groups B and C relative to group C were within 85-120%. All adverse events (AEs) reported in this study were mild, according to the CTCAE guidelines and the study investigator's judgement. ABT bolus injections for 0.5 min and 3 min are expected to be well tolerated and to exhibit similar PK characteristics as IV drip for 45 min, offering potential clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.