ArticleRheumatology international2024
Pre-pregnancy planning for female patients seen at a pregnancy and rheumatic diseases clinic: a retrospective analysis of patients with rheumatic diseases seeking pregnancy-related care.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported reproductive concerns and care needs among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' knowledge and views on unmet needs in prevention of infectious comorbidities in pregnant women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Pregnancy planning in women with rheumatic diseases: an integrated framework for risk stratification and multidisciplinary management.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Analysis of YouTube videos on rheumatic diseases and pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus-related infections in pregnancy: a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Prothrombotic fibrin clot properties are associated with lower live births rate in women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Scoping review of biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: evidence gaps and proposed outcome reporting framework.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Pregnancy Outcomes of Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among Patients With Autoimmune Diseases: A Scoping Review.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Lessons learned from Café Scientifique public webinars on pregnancy and parenting in arthritis: perspectives from patients, clinicians, and researchers.BMC proceedings · 2025Article
- Risk Assessment and Optimization for Pregnancy in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the clinical utility of pre-pregnancy planning among female patients with rheumatic diseases attending a targeted pregnancy and rheumatic diseases clinic. We conducted a retrospective review using data collected via chart review of female patients with rheumatic diseases seen at the Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases Clinic at the Mary Pack Arthritis Centre in Vancouver, Canada, between January 2017 and July 2020. Patients were categorized according to an initial presentation at the clinic as (1) pregnant without pre-pregnancy planning; and (2) not pregnant with pre-pregnancy planning. The latter group was further categorized according to whether they had contraindications to pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Our study included 230 female patients with rheumatic diseases. At the initial clinical presentation, 86 were pregnant and 144 were planning to become pregnant and presenting for pre-pregnancy planning. Compared to patients without pre-pregnancy planning, patients who received pregnancy planning experienced fewer prenatal disease flares (61.3% [38/62] vs. 22.6% [7/31]; p < 0.001), fewer medication changes during pregnancy (46.4% [39/84] vs. 18.9% [10/53]; p = 0.002), and improved disease control in the first trimester of pregnancy (p = 0.018). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of adverse pregnancy or fetal outcomes between patients with and without pre-pregnancy planning. Evaluation of patient outcomes suggests that pre-pregnancy planning may support early assessment of high-risk pregnancy status; therein, allowing healthcare providers to identify and manage risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes among patients living with rheumatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.