ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023
The structure of the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI) should be modified: evidence from a Rasch analysis study.
Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI) comprises seven items of the Early Rehabilitation Index and ten items of the Barthel Index. The ERBI is usually used to measure functional changes in patients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI), but its measurement properties have yet to be extensively assessed.
aimTo study the unidimensionality and internal construct validity (ICV) of the ERBI through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Mokken Analysis (MA), and Rasch Analysis (RA).
designMulticenter prospective study.
settingInpatients from five intensive rehabilitation centers. POPULATION: Two hundred and forty-seven subjects with sABI.
methodsERBI was administered on admission and discharge to study its unidimensionality through CFA and MA and its ICV, reliability, and targeting through RA.
resultsThe preliminary analyses showed a lack of unidimensionality (RMSEA=0.460 >0.06; SRMR=0.176 >0.06; CFI=1.000 >0.950; TLI=1.000 >0.950). According to CFA, "Confusional state" and "Behavioral disturbance" items showed low factor loadings (<0.40), whereas these two items composed a separate scale within the MA. Furthermore, the baseline RA showed that three items misfitted ("Mechanical ventilation," "Confusional state," "Behavioral disturbances") and a lack of conformity of several ICV requirements. After deletion of three misfitting items and further non-structural modifications (i.e., testlets creation to absorb local dependence between items and item misfit), the solution obtained showed adequate ICV, adequate reliability for measurements at the individual level (PSI>0.85), although with a frank floor effect. This final solution was successfully replicated in a total sample of the subjects. After post-hoc modifications of the score structure of two out of three misfitting items, the subsequent CFA (RMSEA=0.044 <0.06; SRMR=0.056 <0.06; CFI=1.000 >0.950 TLI=1.000 >0.950) and MA showed the resolution of the unidimensional issues.
conclusionsAlthough the ERBI is a potentially valuable tool for measuring functioning in the coma-to-community continuum, our analyses suggested its lack of ICV, partly due to an incorrect scoring design of some items. A new perspective multicenter study is proposed to validate a modified version of the ERBI that overcomes the problems highlighted in this analysis. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our results do not support the use of the original structure of the ERBI in clinical practice and research, as a lack of ICV was highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.