Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37534688›Full record

ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2021

Rapid cycle system improvement for COVID-19 readiness: integrating deliberate practice, psychological safety and vicarious learning.

Albert Kam Ming Chan, Jenny W Rudolph, Vivian Nga Man Lau, Henry Man Kin Wong, Rosinni Si Ling Wong, Thomas S F Lo, Gordon Y S Choi, Gavin Matthew Joynt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Quality improvement in the era of boarding and burnout: A postpandemic blueprint.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Translational simulation: from description to action.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Albert Kam Ming ChanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-4166-161X
Jenny W RudolphCenter for Medical Simulation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Vivian Nga Man LauDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Henry Man Kin WongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Rosinni Si Ling WongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Thomas S F LoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Gordon Y S ChoiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Gavin Matthew JoyntDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Prince of Wales Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the face of a rapidly advancing pandemic with uncertain pathophysiology, pop-up healthcare units, ad hoc teams and unpredictable personal protective equipment supply, it is difficult for healthcare institutions and front-line teams to invent and test robust and safe clinical care pathways for patients and clinicians. Conventional simulation-based education was not designed for the time-pressured and emergent needs of readiness in a pandemic. We used 'rapid cycle system improvement' to create a psychologically safe learning oasis in the midst of a pandemic. This oasis provided a context to build staff technical and teamwork capacity and improve clinical workflows simultaneously. Methods: At the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care in Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary institution, in situ simulations were carried out in the operating theatres and intensive care unit (ICU). The translational simulation design leveraged principles of psychological safety, rapid cycle deliberate practice, direct and vicarious learning to ready over 200 staff with 51 sessions and achieve iterative system improvement all within 7 days. Staff evaluations and system improvements were documented postsimulation. Results/Findings: Staff in both operating theatres and ICU were significantly more comfortable and confident in managing patients with COVID-19 postsimulation. Teamwork, communication and collective ability to manage infectious cases were enhanced. Key system issues were also identified and improved. Discussion: To develop readiness in the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrated that 'rapid cycle system improvement' can efficiently help achieve three intertwined goals: (1) ready staff for new clinical processes, (2) build team competence and confidence and (3) improve workflows and procedures.

Indexed as

AnaesthesiaIntensive CareQuality ImprovementSimulation Based EducationTranslational Outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37534688
PMCPMC7441440
OpenAlexW3080712421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.