Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37534515›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2024

Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Laura W Dillon, Jake Higgins, Hassan Nasif, Megan Othus, Lan Beppu, Thomas H Smith, Elizabeth Schmidt, Charles C Valentine Iii, Jesse J Salk, Brent L Wood and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00085709 (A Phase III Study of the Addition of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00085709 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Study of the Addition of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (Mylotarg®) During Induction Therapy Versus Standard Induction With Daunomycin and Cytosine Arabinoside Followed by Consolidation and Subsequent Randomization to Post-Consolidation Therapy With Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (Mylotarg®) or No Additional Therapy For Patients Under Age 61 With Previously Untreated De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2004 to 2014Enrolled637ConditionsLeukemiaArmsgemtuzumab ozogamicin, observation, Cytosine arabinoside, Daunomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mutations and MRD: clinical implications of clonal ontogeny.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Early drivers of clonal hematopoiesis shape the evolutionary trajectories ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura W DillonLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jake HigginsTwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA.
Hassan NasifPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Megan OthusPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Lan BeppuClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Thomas H SmithTwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA.
Elizabeth SchmidtTwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA.
Charles C Valentine IiiTwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA.
Jesse J SalkTwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA.
Brent L WoodDept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Harry P ErbaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Jerald P RadichClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Christopher S HouriganLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Myeloid Malignancies Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. hourigan@nih.gov.

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Catherine M. Tangen · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Detection, prevention and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse.ZIAHL006163 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI HOURIGAN, CHRISTOPHER · 2013 to 2023
$21.0M
Development of a Universal Assay for Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia using Duplex SequencingR44CA233381 · NCI · TWINSTRAND BIOSCIENCES, INC. · PI BICKEL, KELLIE · 2018 to 2025
$5.7M
Understanding and predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemiaR01CA175008 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RADICH, JERALD PATRICK · 2013 to 2023
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175008NCI NIH HHS R44 CA233381NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the correlation with clinical outcomes, MRD assessment has yet to be standardized or routinely incorporated into clinical trials and discrepancies have been observed between different techniques for MRD assessment. In 62 patients with AML, aged 18-60 years, in first complete remission after intensive induction therapy on the randomized phase III SWOG-S0106 clinical trial (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT00085709), MRD detection by centralized, high-quality multiparametric flow cytometry was compared with a 29-gene panel utilizing duplex sequencing (DS), an ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing method that generates double-stranded consensus sequences to reduce false positive errors. MRD as defined by DS was observed in 22 (35%) patients and was strongly associated with higher rates of relapse (68% vs. 13%; hazard ratio [HR] =8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-24.5; P<0.001) and decreased survival (32% vs. 82%; HR=5.6; 95% CI: 2.3-13.8; P<0.001) at 5 years. DS MRD strongly outperformed multiparametric flow cytometry MRD, which was observed in ten (16%) patients and marginally associated with higher rates of relapse (50% vs. 30%; HR=2.4; 95% CI: 0.9-6.7; P=0.087) and decreased survival (40% vs. 68%; HR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.0-6.3; P=0.059) at 5 years. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of DS MRD status at the time of remission for subsequent relapse was similar on both randomized arms of the trial. These findings suggest that next-generation sequencing-based AML MRD testing is a powerful tool that could be developed for use in patient management and for early anti-leukemic treatment assessment in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37534515
PMCPMC10828764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.