ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2023
Comparison of the Efficacy of Amniotic Membrane Versus Buccal Fat Pad in Treatment of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amniotic Membrane-Derived Factors in Immunomodulation and Regenerative Medicine: Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives in Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- The Human Amniotic Membrane: A Rediscovered Tool to Improve Wound Healing in Oral Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Buccal Fat Pad: A Unique Human Anatomical Structure and Rich and Easily Accessible Source of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tissue Repair.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Introduction to Amniotic Membranes in Maxillofacial Surgery-A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Effect of amniotic over collagen membrane and buccal fat pad in treating oral sub-mucous fibrosis.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral and maxillofacial surgery deals with wide range of oral defects, wound closure, tissue resection, and tissue reconstruction. The purpose of our study is to use amniotic membrane for closure of post surgery defect in patient of oral submucous fibrosis to utilize its growth factor and scaffold nature for effective healing and to evaluate effectiveness of amniotic membrane in treatment outcome. The objectives are to compare post-operative mouth opening, healing of amniotic membrane and buccal fat pad. Material and Method: Diagnosed patients with OSMF are divided into two surgical site Group I ( Result: This study suggested that in comparison to buccal fat pad flap, the HAM graft is a better option for oral reconstruction in terms of infection, graft failure, MMO, inflammation, pain. Outcome indicated that the HAM is biologically ideal graft for oral wounds and could be used as clinical alternative for various repair surgery for oral defects. Conclusion: The amniotic membrane was found easy to handle and easy to use with inherent hemostatic property which is observed in all patients. No patients had shown any evidence of any complications. Good pain control observed in patients throughout postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.