ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Validity of the SARC-F questionnaire in assessing sarcopenia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Overlap of Malnutrition, Sarcopenia and Related Nutritional Syndromes in a Large Haemodialysis Population.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Unravelling Sarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Pathogenesis to Diagnosis and Therapeutics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness for sarcopenia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and association of sarcopenic obesity with locomotive syndrome based on the 2024 Consensus Statement of the Japanese Working Group on Sarcopenic Obesity in community-dwelling Japanese women.Journal of physical therapy science · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of SARC-F Sensitivity for Probable Sarcopenia Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIRx med · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Osteosarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Overlooked Syndrome?Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Review
- Article
- A Comparative Analysis of the SARC-F Questionnaire and the Malnutrition-Inflammation Score for Sarcopenia Risk Assessment and Negative Outcome Probability in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of screening tools for sarcopenia in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the validity of the 5-component SARC-F questionnaire for screening sarcopenia among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Eligible participants were enrolled from the Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from March 2019 to November 2019. Evaluations were performed using the self-administered SARC-F questionnaire. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by grip strength, the chair stand test and appendicular skeletal muscle mass. The severity of sarcopenia was evaluated by gait speed. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the SARC-F to evaluate construct validity. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for nondialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients' and maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients' scores. Results: A total of 105 NDD-CKD patients and 125 MHD patients were included, and the prevalence of sarcopenia was 5.7 and 31.2%, respectively. Among them, there were 21 (16.8%) MHD patients with severe sarcopenia but no NDD-CKD patients with severe sarcopenia. The sensitivity and specificity of the SARC-F were 16.7 and 98.0% for NDD-CKD patients, and 48.7 and 89.5% for MHD patients, respectively. For NDD-CKD patients, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the total SARC-F score was 0.978 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.929-0.997, Conclusion: CKD patients, especially MHD patients, were at high risk of suffering sarcopenia. The SARC-F had low-to-moderate sensitivity but high specificity for screening sarcopenia among patients with CKD. The best cutoff values of the SARC-F score were different for screening sarcopenia among NDD-CKD and MHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.