ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Applying a novel two-step deep learning network to improve the automatic delineation of esophagus in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Automatic Explainable Segmentation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm From Computed Tomography Angiography.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To introduce a model for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs at risk (OARs), especially the esophagus, in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy, using a novel two-step deep learning network. Materials and methods: A total of 59 lung cancer patients' CT images were enrolled, of which 39 patients were randomly selected as the training set, 8 patients as the validation set, and 12 patients as the testing set. The automatic segmentations of the six OARs including the esophagus were carried out. In addition, two sets of treatment plans were made on the basis of the manually delineated tumor and OARs (Plan1) as well as the manually delineated tumor and the automatically delineated OARs (Plan2). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and average surface distance (ASD) of the proposed model were compared with those of U-Net as a benchmark. Next, two groups of plans were also compared according to the dose-volume histogram parameters. Results: The DSC, HD95, and ASD of the proposed model were better than those of U-Net, while the two groups of plans were almost the same. The highest mean DSC of the proposed method was 0.94 for the left lung, and the lowest HD95 and ASD were 3.78 and 1.16 mm for the trachea, respectively. Moreover, the DSC reached 0.73 for the esophagus. Conclusions: The two-step segmentation method can accurately segment the OARs of lung cancer. The mean DSC of the esophagus realized preliminary clinical significance (>0.70). Choosing different deep learning networks based on different characteristics of organs offers a new option for automatic segmentation in radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.