Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37534212›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Prognosis prediction and comparison between pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma and pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma: a retrospective observational study.

Hui Zhou, Xiao-Xue Li, Yun-Peng Huang, Yong-Xiang Wang, Heng Zou, Li Xiong, Zhong-Tao Liu, Yu Wen, Zi-Jian Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiao-Xue LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yun-Peng HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yong-Xiang WangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Heng ZouDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Li XiongDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhong-Tao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yu WenDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zi-Jian ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma (PSRCC) is a rare and aggressive cancer that has been reported primarily as case reports. Due to limited large-scale epidemiological and prognostic analyses, the outcomes of PSRCC patients varies greatly in the absence of recognized first-line treatment strategies. This study aimed to compare the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of PSRCC and pancreatic ductal cell carcinoma (PDAC), the most common subtype of pancreatic cancer, and to establish predictive models for these subtypes. Methods: The data on PSRCC and PDAC patients from 1998 to 2018 was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Thereafter, the clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics of the two groups and the differences and influencing factors of the two groups were evaluated by propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox risk regression analyses, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. Next, prognosis models were constructed and validated by KM and ROC analysis. Finally, a nomogram was constructed, based on the results of these analyses, to predict survival outcomes of PSRCC and PDAC patients. Results: A total of 84,789 patients (432 PSRCC and 84357 PDAC patients) were included in this study. The results of the study revealed that, compared to the PDAC patients, PSRCC patients were more likely to be male, aged between 58-72 years, have larger tumor masses, and less likely to undergo chemotherapy. Before PSM, the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of the PSRCC group were significantly lower than those PDAC group, but there was no difference in the prognosis of the two groups after PSM. Additionally, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph node (LODDS), tumor size, age, T-stage, marital status, and summary stage were found to be independent prognostic factors for PSRCC. Lastly, the prediction model and nomogram based on these prognostic factors could accurately predict the survival rate of the patients in SEER datasets and external validation datasets. Conclusion: The prognosis of PSRCC and PDAC patients is similar under the same conditions; however, PSRCC patients may have more difficulty in receiving better treatment, thus resulting in their poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosispancreatic duct adenocarcinomapancreatic signet ring cell carcinomapathologic subtypeprognosisrisk score

Identifiers

PMID37534212
PMCPMC10390323
OpenAlexW4384499850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.