Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37534101›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2022

A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoning.

Aimen Zerroug, Mohit Vaishnav, Julien Colin, Sebastian Musslick, Thomas Serre

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aimen ZerrougArtificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute, Université de Toulouse, France.
Mohit VaishnavArtificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute, Université de Toulouse, France.
Julien ColinCarney Institute for Brain Science, Dept. of Cognitive Linguistic & Psychological Sciences Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Sebastian MusslickCarney Institute for Brain Science, Dept. of Cognitive Linguistic & Psychological Sciences Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Thomas SerreArtificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute, Université de Toulouse, France.
Université de Toulouse · FR

Funding

Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
Next generation machine vision for automated behavioral phenotyping of knock-in ALS-FTD mouse modelsR21NS112743 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI FALLON, JUSTIN R., SERRE, THOMAS · 2020 to 2020
$447k
NIH HHS S10 OD025181NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS112743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental component of human vision is our ability to parse complex visual scenes and judge the relations between their constituent objects. AI benchmarks for visual reasoning have driven rapid progress in recent years with state-of-the-art systems now reaching human accuracy on some of these benchmarks. Yet, there remains a major gap between humans and AI systems in terms of the sample efficiency with which they learn new visual reasoning tasks. Humans' remarkable efficiency at learning has been at least partially attributed to their ability to harness compositionality - allowing them to efficiently take advantage of previously gained knowledge when learning new tasks. Here, we introduce a novel visual reasoning benchmark, Compositional Visual Relations (CVR), to drive progress towards the development of more data-efficient learning algorithms. We take inspiration from fluid intelligence and non-verbal reasoning tests and describe a novel method for creating compositions of abstract rules and generating image datasets corresponding to these rules at scale. Our proposed benchmark includes measures of sample efficiency, generalization, compositionality, and transfer across task rules. We systematically evaluate modern neural architectures and find that convolutional architectures surpass transformer-based architectures across all performance measures in most data regimes. However, all computational models are much less data efficient than humans, even after learning informative visual representations using self-supervision. Overall, we hope our challenge will spur interest in developing neural architectures that can learn to harness compositionality for more efficient learning.

Identifiers

PMID37534101
PMCPMC10396074
OpenAlexW4306802685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.