Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533999›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Convolutional neural network-based recognition method for volleyball movements.

Hua Wang, Xiaojiao Jin, Tianyang Zhang, Jianbin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hua WangPhysical Education Department, Xinxiang Institute of Engineering, Xinxiang, 453000, China.
Xiaojiao JinPhysical Education Department, Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, 054000, China.
Tianyang ZhangSports Work Department, Hebei Vocational University of Technology and Engineering, Xingtai, 054000, China.
Jianbin WangPhysical Education Department, Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, 054000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of network technology and computer intelligent monitoring technology, a large number of video data came into being. In view of the analysis of specific targets in video, the traditional artificial analysis method can not meet the existing needs. In volleyball teaching in college physical education, because each student has different movements, intelligent processing of video data has become a key issue. Through collecting and sorting out the relevant research results on behavior recognition, it is found that in the research of deep learning, the algorithm structure applied in this paper is representative, and its strong learning ability, especially compared with the traditional algorithm, can more accurately identify human movements, natural language processing and so on, but the research on volleyball action recognition is still less. Therefore, this paper constructs a data set, improves the convolution neural network model, subsequently, new models are constructed through the neural network structure to improve the accuracy of the nonlinear expression and optimize the content of the input data. In order to more accurately analyze the effectiveness of this algorithm, the new data are obtained by grouping the volleyball games in college sports courses. Compared with the original paper, the accuracy of the improved 3D network is improved by 3.3%-88.5%, and the complexity is reduced by 33.6%.

Indexed as

AccuracyComplexityConvolution neural networkMotion recognitionPhysical education curriculum

Identifiers

PMID37533999
PMCPMC10391947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.