ArticleHeliyon2023
Comparative analysis of fracture characteristics between rock and rock-like materials.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to investigate the characteristics of rock and rock-like materials during the fracture process, notched semi-circular bending (SCB) experiments of 3 rocks and 2 rock-like materials were conducted in this paper. The process of the crack mouth opening was measured with a clip gauge. Acoustic emission was used to analyze the damage and failure mode of the specimens. Meanwhile, the fracture process zone (FPZ) was analyzed with the digital image correlation (DIC). Finally, the differences in the fracture process between rocks and rock-like materials were observed with a polarized microscope, and the formation mechanism of FPZ was discussed. The results indicate that the sequence from brittleness to plasticity is gypsum, marble, granite, concrete and fine sandstone. The crack opening velocity of gypsum, marble, and granite reaches 0.02-0.025 mm/s, far exceeding that of sandstone and concrete at 0.003 mm/s and 0.005 mm/s. The stronger the brittleness of geomaterials, the less significant their acoustic emission effect. Only a few acoustic emissions occur during the fracture process of gypsum with 8 hits. Its fracture occurs instantaneously rather than through a process of damage to fracture and the failure mode is tensile failure. Sandstone has the strongest plasticity, with a large count of acoustic emissions before and after fracture, with a hit number of 5062, which is 630 times of pure gypsum. The fracture is a process of damage accumulation with 94% of sandstone, 89% of concrete, 80% of granite, and 60% of marble showing a tensile and shear failure mode except gypsum. In addition, the stronger the brittleness of geomaterials, the smaller their FPZ size. The FPZ of gypsum is only about 3 mm, which can be considered as lacking, while other materials are about 6-11 mm. The formation of FPZ depends on whether an interlocking structure can be formed inside the material, which is related to the base material and crystalline or aggregate particle size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.