Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533991›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Can multi-agent cooperation promote the ecological value realization of blue carbon in marine ranching?

Xuechang Zhang, Jingwei Cheng, Shan Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuechang ZhangSchool of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, PR China.
Jingwei ChengSchool of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, PR China.
Shan ZhengSchool of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological value realization of blue carbon in marine ranching is essential to achieve carbon neutrality. The motivation for conducting the study is to verify whether multi-agent cooperation can promote the ecological value realization of blue carbon in marine ranching. Based on the blue carbon ecological value realization model of marine ranching enterprises, blue carbon demand enterprises, blue carbon trading platforms and government, this paper explores the cooperative governance strategy of marine ranching for each subject using cooperative game and non-cooperative game models. Further, we conduct a comparative analysis to arrive at the optimal strategy. The conclusions are as follows. Multi-agent cooperation is more conducive to the ecological value realization of blue carbon in marine ranching. Compared with non-cooperative governance, the platform's commission and blue carbon price are lower, and the blue carbon output, profit of each market subject, government utility and overall profit are higher in cooperative governance. The strengths of this paper lie in 2 aspects. First, we focuses on the ecological value of blue carbon in marine ranching instead of economic value, providing a new theoretical basis for ecological compensation in marine ranching. Second, we construct a government-led and market-oriented operation of marine ranching's blue carbon ecological value realization mechanism, incorporating blue carbon trading platform and government into the value realization model.

Indexed as

Blue carbon sinkEcological value realizationGame strategyMarine ranchingMulti-agent cooperation

Identifiers

PMID37533991
PMCPMC10392078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.