Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533929›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Shortening identification times: comparative observational study of three early blood culture testing protocols.

Paul-Antoine Chatelard, Nathalie Rousseau, Laurence Parmeland, Pierre Metral, Caroline Pariset, Emmanuel Vivier

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul-Antoine ChatelardCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Lyon, France.
Nathalie RousseauCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Laboratoire de biologie médicale, Lyon, France.
Laurence ParmelandCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Laboratoire de biologie médicale, Lyon, France.
Pierre MetralCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Département d'Information Médicale, Lyon, France.
Caroline ParisetCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Maladies Infectieuses, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel VivierCentre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Lyon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Saint-Joseph Saint-Luc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While early appropriate antibiotic therapy is a proven means of limiting the progression of infections, especially bacteremia, empirical antibiotic therapy in sepsis is ineffective up to 30%. The aim of this study was to compare early blood culture testing protocols in terms of their ability to shorten the delay between blood sampling and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Methods: In this french observational study, we compared three blood culture testing protocols. Positive blood cultures were tested using either GenMark ePlex panels (multiplex PCR period), a combination of MRSA/SA PCR, Results: Among the 270 patients with positive blood cultures included, early and conventional results were in good agreement, especially for the multitest period. The delay between a blood culture positivity and initial results was 3.8 (2.9-6.9) h in the multiplex PCR period, 2.6 (1.3-4.5) h in the multitest period and 3.7 (1.8-8.2) h in the reference period (p<0.01). Antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted in 68 patients based on early analysis results. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy within 48 h of blood sampling was higher in the multiplex PCR and multitest periods, (respectively 90% and 88%) than in the reference period (71%). Conclusion: These results suggest rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance tests are feasible, efficient and can expedite appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Indexed as

BacteremiaSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsbacteremiaePlex assayMRSA/SA PCRoxidase testβ-Lacta test

Identifiers

PMID37533929
PMCPMC10390722
OpenAlexW4384692698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.