ArticleArthroscopy techniques2023
Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair With Preserved Biceps Anatomy.
Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subscapularis Partial Thickness Tears by Yoo and Rhee Classification: Identifying MRI Predictors for Type IIB, Requiring Surgical Repair.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Retro All-Suture Anchor Technique for Subscapularis Repair Using a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Guide.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arthroscopic subscapularis repair continues to improve with the advancement of surgical technique and critical focus on careful intraoperative evaluation. As identification of these tears increases, there is an expected increase in repair rates as well. Anatomically, the upper border of the subscapularis and the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are in close relation. Many surgeons have advocated concomitant LHB tenotomy versus tenodesis in conjunction with operative subscapularis tears. We hypothesized that in the setting of a preserved anatomic biceps pulley and no LHB pathology, isolated subscapularis repair would result in excellent clinical outcomes when compared with subscapularis repair and biceps tenotomy or tenodesis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.