Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533885›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Biopsychosocial factors of gaming disorder: a systematic review employing screening tools with well-defined psychometric properties.

Rose Seoyoung Chang, Minju Lee, Jooyeon Jamie Im, Kee-Hong Choi, Jueun Kim, Jeanyung Chey, Suk-Ho Shin, Woo-Young Ahn

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rose Seoyoung ChangDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minju LeeDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jooyeon Jamie ImDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kee-Hong ChoiSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jueun KimDepartment of Psychology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jeanyung CheyDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suk-Ho ShinDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dr. Shin's Neuropsychiatric Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Young AhnDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRChungnam National University · KRKorea University · KRNeurology, Inc · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Considering the growing number of gamers worldwide and increasing public concerns regarding the negative consequences of problematic gaming, the aim of the present systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of gaming disorder (GD) by identifying empirical studies that investigate biological, psychological, and social factors of GD using screening tools with well-defined psychometric properties. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed, RISS, and KISS, and papers published up to January 2022 were included. Studies were screened based on the GD diagnostic tool usage, and only five scales with well-established psychometric properties were included. A total of 93 studies were included in the synthesis, and the results were classified into three groups based on biological, psychological, and social factors. Results: Biological factors ( Discussion: When the excess amount of assessment tools with varying psychometric properties were controlled for, mixed results were observed with regards to impulsivity, social relations, and family-related factors, and some domains suffered from a lack of study results to confirm any relevant patterns. Conclusion: More longitudinal and neurobiological studies, consensus on a diagnostic tool with well-defined psychometric properties, and an in-depth understanding of gaming-related factors should be established to settle the debate regarding psychometric weaknesses of the current diagnostic system and for GD to gain greater legitimacy in the field of behavioral addiction.

Indexed as

behavioral addictionbiopsychosocial modelgaming disorderGDpathological gamingproblematic gaming

Identifiers

PMID37533885
PMCPMC10390702
OpenAlexW4384666105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.