Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533825›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Flint corn silage management: influence of maturity stage, inoculation with

Luis G Rossi, Marina E B Andrade, Carlos H S Rabelo, Gustavo R Siqueira, Eduardo F Vicente, Wilton L Silva, Matheus M Silva, Ricardo A Reis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determining the Optimal Harvesting Moment of Green Forage fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis G RossiDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Marina E B AndradeDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Carlos H S RabeloDepartment of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil.
Gustavo R SiqueiraDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo F VicenteFaculty of Science and Engineering, São Paulo State University, Tupã, SP, Brazil.
Wilton L SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Matheus M SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo A ReisDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: High quality corn silage depends on factors such as corn type, stage of crop development at harvest time, fermentation time, in addition to use or not of inoculants. This study aimed to investigate the impact of maturity stage, bacterial inoculation, and storage time on fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritional characteristics of flint corn silage and their implications for corn silage management. Methods: A flint corn hybrid was harvested very early, early, and medium (at 250, 300 and 350 g dry matter (DM)/kg as fed, respectively) and ensiled in mini-silos without (control) or with Results and discussion: There was only a small increase (7 g/kg starch; Conclusion: The storage for a longer time (>120 d) with the goal of increasing silage digestibility did not occur. Harvesting whole-crop flint corn with 300 to 350 g/kg DM is desirable to have higher DM yield and starch accumulation. Inoculation with

Indexed as

corn silageflint hybridLentilactobacillus buchnerimaturitystarch digestionstorage length

Identifiers

PMID37533825
PMCPMC10390726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.