ReviewSleep medicine: X2023
Sleep disruption, use of sleep-promoting medication and circadian desynchronization in spaceflight crewmembers: Evidence in low-Earth orbit and concerns for future deep-space exploration missions.
Review in Sleep medicine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spaceflight and sport science: Physiological monitoring and countermeasures for the astronaut-athlete on Mars exploration missions.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Women in space: A review of known physiological adaptations and health perspectives.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Hypnogram-Driven Automatic Sleep Staging and a Quality-Index Assessment Through a Two-Stage LSTM-DNN Ensemble Learning Approach Using Multi-Biosignal Features for Sleep Disorder Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Submarine medicine as an analog for spaceflight: a review of acute medical care.NPJ microgravity · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical and biomedical challenges for crew autonomy in health preservation during future exploration missions.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Spaceflight exposome/microgravity effects on the psychoimmunoneuroendocrine system.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- On the nose: nasal neurostimulation as a technology countermeasure for sinonasal congestion in astronauts.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The spaceflight environment presents unique demands on human physiology; among those demands, is sleep. Sleep loss and circadian desynchronization is a major concern for future deep- exploration plans, including long-term crewed missions to the Moon and Mars. Aims: Analyze evidence of sleep disruption in crewmembers during low-Earth orbit missions, identify the use of sleep-promoting medication among crewmembers and deepen the comprehension of challenges to sleep physiology for future missions to the Moon and Mars. Results: Evidence consistently indicates a loss of sleep and circadian rhythm disruption during low-Earth orbit missions. Sleep duration is shortened especially the night before a critical operation and during circadian-misaligned sleep episodes. The prevalence of sleep-promoting medication ranges between 71% and 78%; medication is more frequently taken on circadian-misaligned sleep episodes. Regarding the Moon, Apollo astronauts had variable sleep duration. For some, sleep was restful while others had poor-quality sleep. Many reported fatigue and errors due to the lack of rest. A loss of the 24-h light/dark might be expected due to the Moon's complex illumination characteristics. Regarding Mars, one main challenge will consist in synchronizing the circadian clock to a Martian day (24.65 h).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.