ReviewVaccine: X2023
Obstacles to routine immunization in Madagascar: Structural, relational and cultural constraints.
Review in Vaccine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in reaching zero-dose children: analysis of population-modifiable risk factors and inequity trends in low- and lower-middle-income countries.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Health system stakeholders' perceptions of religious and socio-cultural influences on measles vaccine hesitancy in Madagascar: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Human papillomavirus awareness and vaccination willingness among adults in Madagascar: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Designing for Equity: An Evaluation Framework to Assess Zero-Dose Reduction Efforts in Southern Madagascar.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Regional, subregional and country-level full vaccination coverage in children aged 12-23 months for 34 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a global analysis using Demographic and Health Survey data.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Full vaccination coverage for children aged 12-23 months in Madagascar: Analysis of the 2021 Demographic and Health Survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes an overview of anthropological studies concerning childhood immunization in Madagascar, where vaccine coverage still remains low. The COVID-19 epidemic has heightened the reticence of populations to be vaccinated in the public health centres of this country. It appears necessary to study the factors which may impact immunization practices and its representations. The principal results of these studies describe immunization from the perspective of parents of children under five years of age. The role that they attribute to a vaccine is essentially that of reinforcing the health of children against illness. There is a misunderstanding of combination vaccines, one vaccine generally being associated with one disease. The findings also show a complex relationship with immunization, injections and the health passport. Finally, uptake of immunization or not is motivated by the structural and local context such as the perceived frailness of the newborn baby, the practice of post-partum confinement, or the lack of knowledge about the vaccine. Lack of understanding of immunization and mistrust of it are signs of a fragile health system. An in-depth analysis of immunization and the impact of COVID-19 on its perception will provide a clearer view of the fragility of the immunization programmes implemented in Madagascar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.