Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533589›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2023

"Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers of Luminal Breast Cancer: Where are We Now?"

Anna Höller, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Heike Frauchiger-Heuer, Alexander Ring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Höller *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-830X
Heike Frauchiger-Heuer *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander Ring *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0092-1323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luminal breast cancers are hormone receptor (estrogen and/or progesterone) positive that are further divided into HER2-negative luminal A and HER2-positive luminal B subtypes. According to currently accepted convention, they represent the most common subtypes of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 70% of cases. Biomarkers play a critical role in the functional characterization, prognostication, and therapeutic prediction, rendering them indispensable for the clinical management of invasive breast cancer. Traditional biomarkers include clinicopathological parameters, which are increasingly extended by genetic and other molecular markers, enabling the comprehensive characterization of patients with luminal breast cancer. Liquid biopsies capturing and analyzing circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are emerging technologies that envision personalized management through precision oncology. This article reviews key biomarkers in luminal breast cancer and ongoing developments.

Indexed as

biomarkerbreast cancercirculating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAluminal A and B

Identifiers

PMID37533589
PMCPMC10392911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.