Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533538›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2023

The Resident Learning Journey in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Tyler L Herzog, Adam P Sawatsky, Diana J Kelm, Darlene R Nelson, John G Park, Alexander S Niven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler L HerzogDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-0544
Adam P SawatskyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-7984
Diana J KelmDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-4053
Darlene R NelsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9287-1222
John G ParkDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.
Alexander S NivenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-9495
Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The medical intensive care unit (MICU) offers rich resident learning opportunities, but traditional teaching strategies can be difficult to employ in this fast-paced, high-acuity environment. Resident perspectives of learning within this environment may improve our understanding of the common challenges residents face and inform novel approaches to transform the MICU educational experience. Objective: We conducted a qualitative study of internal medicine residents to better understand their approach to learning the critical care activities that they are entrusted to perform in the MICU. Methods: Using a thematic analysis approach, we conducted six focus group interviews with 15 internal medicine residents, separated by postgraduate year. A trained investigator led each interview, which was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Our diverse research team, representing different career stages across the continuum of learning to minimize interpretive bias, identified codes and subsequent themes inductively. We refined these themes through group discussion and sensitizing social learning theory concepts using Wenger's community of practice and organized them to create learner archetypes and a conceptual framework of resident learning in the MICU. Results: We identified three thematic resident learning categories: learning goals and motivation, clinical engagement, and interprofessional collaboration. We distinguished three learner archetypes, the novice, experiential learner, and practicing member, to describe progressive resident development within the interprofessional MICU team, the challenges they frequently encounter, and potential teaching strategies to facilitate learning. Conclusion: We developed a conceptual framework that describes the resident's journey to becoming a trusted, collaborating member of the interprofessional MICU team. We identified common developmental challenges residents face and offer educational strategies that may support their progress. These findings should inform future efforts to develop novel teaching strategies to promote resident learning in the MICU.

Indexed as

intensive care unitsinternship and residency/educationinterprofessional education

Identifiers

PMID37533538
PMCPMC10391714
OpenAlexW4322624762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.